Monday, March 23, 2026

DAVID ROTHKOPF

 So, As It Turns Out, Brain-Dead, Morally Bankrupt, Rampant Incompetence Matters

How do we know? Look around you.

David Rothkopf

Mar 23

 

 

 

Pickett charged. France built the Maginot line. The Empire left a big honking hole in the side of the Death Star, which allowed it to be destroyed.

The history of military stupidity could fill volumes. But never, never has anyone seen a combination of ignorance, incoherence, and incompetence as we have seen from Donald Trump, Pete Hegseth, and their Capitol Hill chorus of wingnut oompa loompas.

 

I have long felt that one of the many flaws of the culture of Washington, DC—which, candidly, I see as responsible for many of this country’s ills—is that the least admired or discussed quality we seek in our leaders is management skill.

Naturally, that critique has changed dramatically in the Age of Trump.

Other fundamental systemic flaws have come to the fore. Most notable among these is corruption. It may be a cliché that money is the root of all evil. But that does not mean it is not true in certain settings. Our nation’s capital is one of them.

Money is the toxin that has put the interests of the few ahead of the interests of all the rest of us, turned control of our politics over to an ever-more powerful oligarchy and perverted our national priorities in myriad profoundly dangerous ways both at home and abroad. But it has not just undermined democracy in America. It has also produced a class of professional politicians and their supporting cast in the policy community who dance to the tune of those who are enriching them today or who will do so tomorrow.

The promise of future of employment hinted at over breakfast at the Four Seasons restaurant in Georgetown and a pattern of senior government officials becoming millionaires many times over upon their departure from the government has led many an influential Washingtonian to put their thumb on the scales of national legislative or public policy outcomes. No cash is exchanged—for now. No brown paper bags full of money are handed over (except in the case of the crassly clueless like DHS thug Tom Homan). Instead, there is a you-scratch-my-back, I’ll-make-you-richer-than-you’ve-ever-dreamed subtext to thousands of conversations a day in the city that has pushed our government further and further from the ideal of serving the “will of the people.”

Some people are served to be sure. Just not most of us.

Another fundamental and deeply ingrained pathology in the way Washington works is that the incentives that exist within the city for those who have aspirations to more power through winning appointment to top jobs are all wrong. To get confirmed by the Senate for a senior job or even to be considered for one by the White House Office of Personnel Management, now requires that candidates have a paper trails that is largely scrubbed of controversy.

(While this is not true for some at the top of a lawless administration like the current one, it is consistently true even among our more traditional and even “high-minded” leadership teams.)

The result is that people who want top jobs refrain from every saying or writing anything publicly that might be a source of controversy. In turn, this leads to people being seen as “promising” or “hirable” not because of the quality of their thinking but for the absence of it.

The result is a risk-averse community in which non-entities are often seen as the most acceptable candidates.

Call it the bland-leading-the-bland.

This in turn has produced another twist in an already deeply twisted leadership culture in the United States—the elevation of people to top jobs with little or no experience handling tough decisions or, in some cases, with little to no experience at all.

When being confirmable in an atmosphere of hyper media (and especially social media) scrutiny leads to hiring folks who just don’t know what they’re doing, that leads to not just something less than the best and the brightest (a term of derision when it was first floated by David Halberstam back in the day when there was at least a pretense of seeking officials with strong credentials), it leads to ineptitude.

Combine it with a president who is an authoritarian ego-maniac who does not think he needs advice at all—and who therefore appoints people to top jobs who are either nullities, agents of his own corruption (see above), or who possess other traits that he does value (like blind, German Shepherd-like, loyalty to him) and you have the birth of another disease within our nation’s leadership culture: profound, almost unfathomable incompetence.

Like a focus on management skills, incompetence is not super sexy to write about and after all, reporters also end up serving twisted incentive structures (in which drama or chaos or criminality or lunacy produce the kind of headlines that keep them employed), too. So, writing that people just aren’t up to the job is not done as often as it ought to be. (As it happens, another problem with DC and the way U.S. democracy has evolved is that the oxygen of our political ecosystem is media coverage of leaders who recognize that the access they provide reporters is yet another way to make a pay off, buy loyalty, gain influence…just the same as dangling a job at Goldman Sachs or handing Homan a bag full of cash.

It is hard to overstate how broken DC has become from the venal careerism from its hyper-ambitious residents…and the wink, wink, nod, nod “this is how the game is played” dimensions of life in this literal and figurative swamp.

That’s not to say there are not many people in Washington who have come here out of a desire to serve their country. There are. It’s just that fewer and fewer of them are found where they should be, in top jobs, as the system of rewards and what is valued becomes more and more bent.

When we have people without values atop the system, it quickly therefore becomes the worst possible version of itself.

Doubt me? Read a newspaper.

(Americans shift to forms of following the news that are more superficial, sensational and short-sighted are just one of the ways this country’s citizens help feed what is broken in DC. That’s not news. But, neither is most of what they prefer to read. Suffice it to say the rampant decline in our national culture and standards (Kardashianism) has exacerbated just what is wrong with Washington—which has been, let’s be honest, pretty fucked up since the days that Jefferson and Hamilton hired pamphleteers to traffic in the scandals of one another or when robber barons had special access to presidents and were hands-on co-managers of the national economy.)

Anyway, back to the worst possible version of a deeply fucked-up leadership culture in our nation’s capital…which would be the one we have got now. All the above maladies are serious and not only deserve to be scrutinized more carefully but must be corrected if we are ever to pull this country out of the tailspin it is in. And make no mistake about it. We’re in a tailspin. It’s not just that the news has left your head spinning.

But the point I want to make is that lost in this dysfunction gumbo upon which America’s government floats, that we’re seeing unprecedented levels of fuckery across the board and that in the midst of all that, it may be hard to appreciate just how off-the-scale we are on the sheer incompetence part of the equation.

Trump, to begin with, is both intellectually lazy and intellectually defective. He is a megalomaniac and a narcissist who thinks he’s the world’s expert on everything and who also fears being exposed by anyone who actually understands what is going on. So, the president in most need of good advice from good advisors is getting less of it than any in our modern history. Indeed, to paraphrase John F. Kennedy, even when Thomas Jefferson dined alone he was getting more better guidance from the voices in his head than Trump is getting from his entire government of imbeciles and yes-men and yes-women.

And he doesn’t know it. So he forges ahead with idiotic impulse-driven directive after moronic brain fart-driven command. And no one challenges him. Not in the White House. Not in his family. Not in the right-wing media bubble. Not on Capitol Hill. Not even from the voices in his own head which are probably resulting from diseased flashbacks to the sex crimes of his youth and thereafter.

Compounding the problem(s) described above, the people called upon to carry out his orders are toadies who are the most incompetent cluster of humans ever assembled in a single government and possibly in a single group. I was pretty sure that evolution had eliminated all such groups in the past as you would have assumed their impulses to eat rocks and fuck knotholes in trees would have led to their dying out.

But apparently no.

So we have the least able, most defective Secretary of Defense in U.S. history presiding over illegal war after war crime after misguided military adventure after Christian-nationalist-inspired new crusade. We have a Secretary of the Treasury who looks like a cartoon rich person and proves like Trump and so many in his orbit that being rich does not imply being smart. We have a Secretary of State who is so blinded by ambition that he surgically removed his own spine just as he slithered into a pair of clown-shoe-sized Florsheims. And that is to say nothing of evil lizard-person Stephen Miller, worm-brained crank RFK, Jr., the anti-education former wrestling exec who is dismantling our Department of Education, our energy and transportation secretaries who simply take dictation from big campaign donors without a clue as to what they are doing, the posse of corrupt racists who are running our Department of Homeland Security and all the rest. There is more cage-fighting experience in this government leadership team than there are people who actually know how to run-government agencies and when it comes to sex-abuse charges or hosting Fox television shows there is a superabundance whereas when it comes to qualified administrators with even an understanding of good governance, we have none.

Which is how you get a war like the one in Iran which was unnecessary, misguided and is producing virtually ever unintended but predictable consequence imaginable. It is also how you have in virtually every cabinet department people not just making bad choices but people making the worst possible choices—on healthcare, environment, finance, retirement, social services, agriculture or every other government function.

Not just bad choices.

The worst possible choices. The opposite of what we need. More endless wars. Much bigger budget deficits. More for those who need it least and less for those who need it most. Destroying our environment. Empowering our enemies. Empowering our economic rivals.

Not just bad choices. But the worst possible choices.

Executed in the worst possible way by the worst possible people.

And stop and think. You know this is not an overheated partisan rant. You know it is the truth. The world knows it is the truth.

Every day the evidence we see proves it is so. A war that shouldn’t have been started. That has produced zero net benefits for the American people. At an incredibly high cost after only three weeks. The entire Middle East is aflame. There is no near-term prospect of a return to pre-war stability. Iran’s nuclear program is not only not destroyed but the incentives for it to restart the program or use its enriched uranium stockpiles have gone up. So too has the government gone from hardline to very likely even more extreme. We have seen the biggest global disruption in energy supplies ever. Global gas and food prices and shortages are likely to continue for months after the war ends…whenever that is, whatever “ending” the war means. Our allies are angrier than ever at us. Israel is waging simultaneous and inhumane wars and fighting in Gaza, the West Bank and in Lebanon. Our military is distracted from its other priorities. Our stockpiles of key weapons are depleted and will take years to replenish. Ukraine, where our investment of money and materiel produced the greatest return on investment in U.S. defense spending history, is now being squeezed and will find it harder to get crucial U.S. air defense systems. At the same time, Ukraine’s enemy, Russia…the enemy of all U.S. interests in Europe…is both assisting Iran with targeting Americans and, at the same time, being enriched by crazy U.S. policies of lifting sanctions on the trade in Russian energy. Even more crazy, we’re allowing the sale of Iranian oil which will help refill Iran’s coffers…a bigger bonanza by far for Iran than the one Trump so criticized when the U.S. under Obama returned some Iranian assets in partial exchange for a much-needed nuclear deal…which Trump broke. China, our number one rival, gains status as a force for stability when we are seen as erratic and dangerous. Chinese focuses on growth…we continue not just to focus on war as we foolishly have done for a quarter century but other Trump policies are destroying our other competitive advantages one by one.

It’s a fiasco driven entirely by Guinness Book of World Records-level incompetence.

It’s not the sexiest story about this particularly fucked up moment in U.S. history. But it is one that we, as voters, need to note.

It matters if our leaders know how to do their jobs, if the people around them know how to do their jobs, if what they seek are good outcomes, if they know the difference between good and bad outcomes, if they are capable morally and intellectually of serving the people.

And, right now, we’re zero for everything on that list.

Which is why we are up to our necks in alligators in a fetid, shit-filled swamp of national crisis and decline.

Heather - 3-22

 

What Happens When You Pay Ex–Gang Members to Stop Crime? Ask Chicago.

 

What Happens When You Pay Ex–Gang Members to Stop Crime? Ask Chicago.

Illinois pays former gang members to prevent shootings in Chicago. Critics say the billion-dollar experiment has become a revolving door for crime.

By Olivia Reingold

 

This fall, a Chicago headline caught my eye: A man who had posed with Governor J.B. Pritzker at a “Peacekeepers” anti-violence event had just been charged with murder.

The man was part of a state-funded program designed to prevent gang violence by paying locals—often former gang members—to mediate conflicts on the street. About a week after appearing with the governor, prosecutors say, the man participated in a smash-and-grab robbery of a Louis Vuitton store. In the chaotic getaway, another man was killed: Mark Carlo Arceta, whose son was born the next day without a father.

The story raised obvious questions: What exactly is a Peacekeeper? And how often do people in this program end up back in cuffs?

The local press quickly moved on. I started digging.

After three months of Freedom of Information Act requests, door-knocking, and speaking with ex–gang members, I answer those questions in today’s story.

The Peacekeepers program is just a single piece of an experiment in crime-fighting that has attracted around a billion dollars. It also is a program that a growing chorus of city leaders, law enforcement officials, and even a donor now say doesn’t work. One city alderman called it a “scam.” A member of the mayor’s own public safety team told me it is a “revolving door” for gang members.

 

I: “The Biggest Lobby in Chicago”

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS — Darron Randle said he used to believe anyone could change—even the hardened ex–gang members he counseled on the South Side.

“I was extremely optimistic,” he said.

As a life coach at the Firehouse Community Arts Center, a violence-prevention nonprofit that has received more than a million dollars in public funding since 2022, Randle advised participants on how to live an honest life. The men attended therapy sessions, worked toward their high school diplomas, and met with Randle twice a week. In exchange, they received up to $550 every two weeks.

Everything was fine, Randle said. Until the checks ran late one payday. Almost immediately, a mob of about 30 men gathered, some of whom blocked the office doors so no one could leave.

“We were held hostage almost. . . . It really was scary,” said Randle, who grew up in a Bronzeville project. “I was uncertain as to what could happen, like a fight could break out. I didn’t feel safe.”

Eventually, he said the organization’s director dispersed the crowd.

Though the director remembers it differently—he says he never had to break up a group—Randle stands by his memory and the lesson he took from it. “This isn’t working,” he remembered thinking.

Darron Randle. (The Free Press)

 

“There’s so much blood that’s been spilled in these streets, I don’t know what the answer is anymore.”

The idea of fighting crime by paying ex–gang members might be new to you, but this sort of program, which often goes under the name of “community violence intervention,” has become the norm in blue cities like Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York City over the past decade.

Proponents of this approach argue that, rather than relying on policing to prevent gang violence and reduce shootings, some amount of police work can be replaced with state-backed, man-on-the-street initiatives. In Chicago, that includes hiring former gang members to counsel current ones and resolve disputes. The programs go by different names: violence prevention, violence interrupters, Peacekeepers.

In recent weeks, I’ve investigated whether this strategy is working—or whether taxpayers and philanthropists are inadvertently funding gang violence in Chicago. Randle is one of many outreach workers, South Side residents, and donors we spoke to who say they’re losing confidence in community violence intervention.

Over the past decade, taxpayers and private donors have spent around $1 billion on community violence intervention (CVI) programs in Chicago, according to an analysis by The Free Press.

The funds have gone toward dozens of programs. They include things like trauma-informed therapy sessionsfinancial literacy courses, and a state-funded program called the Peacekeepers, which pays former gang members and other “justice-impacted” participants up to $150 a day to mediate gang conflicts and reduce gun violence. But public records obtained by The Free Press and interviews with three dozen former gang members, high-ranking city officials, and even one prominent CVI donor, reveal an ecosystem in which a number of participants have been arrested for everything from murder to battery, and funding has sometimes gone toward causes only loosely connected to violence prevention.

Craig Carrington, a community court case manager for the Restorative Justice Community Court in Cook County told me he sees violence interrupters at the courthouse.

“They’re supposed to be out here stopping crime, but then they go and catch a case themselves,” Carrington told me.

CVI is backed by some of the biggest names in Chicago—and the country—including mega-philanthropist Laurene Powell Jobs, the billionaire widow of Apple co-founder Steve Jobs, Illinois governor J.B. Pritzker, and Chicago’s mayor, Brandon Johnson, a progressive who has helped secure funding for these programs. But not all city leaders have bought in.

At City Hall, Alderman Silvana Tabares called CVI a “scam.” She said nonprofits are lobbying legislators to push violence intervention as an “alternative to law enforcement.”

“The biggest lobby in Chicago is not big business,” Tabares said. “It’s the nonprofits, and they’re using the blood flowing in the streets, demanding funding with no strings attached. There is no accountability for how the money is being flown into these programs. No accountability whatsoever.”

While the mayor is supportive of CVI, a key member of his public safety team told me CVI is a “revolving door” for gang members. Some of these guys who are collecting money through CVI are still committing crimes,” the public safety team employee said. “It’s a huge problem.”

“They are actually paying people for being a gang member—that’s what they’re doing.”

The chairman of the Committee on Public Safety, Alderman Brian Hopkins, told me that legacy media in Chicago has ignored a glaring problem.

“We’re giving too much money to the wrong people with no accountability. I know it’s hundreds of millions,” he said. “The mayor, in this last budget cycle, was proposing a so-called ‘community safety fund’ where he wanted to spend $100 million, and we asked him on what? And he said, ‘Well, violence interruption.’ Can you be more specific? It’s $100 million. You don’t get a blank check for $100 million in government.”

Hopkins said one of the reasons the budget didn’t pass was because of suspicion “that money would be squandered.”

“When things are intentionally obfuscated behind, you know, the red velvet curtain where nobody’s allowed to peek,” he continued, “that’s what’s happening right now in Chicago, and that’s very dangerous.”

II. Recasting Crime as a “Disease”

After spending a decade abroad fighting tuberculosis, cholera, and AIDS in Africa, epidemiologist Gary Slutkin had an idea: What if gun violence was best understood as a disease?

In 1995, he founded CeaseFire (now known as Cure Violence), a Chicago-based nonprofit that trained “violence interrupters” on how to defuse conflict and deployed them throughout their communities. It was an idea Slutkin said could “begin to make violence a thing of the past as we have for other contagious diseases.”

Within a decade, its approach had spread across America—and even to Iraq, Syria, and the West Bank. Yet, more than two decades later, there still appears to be no cure for crime in Chicago. The city remains the murder capital of the U.S., according to the latest data.

Some parts of the city—especially the South Side—have a murder rate on par with Tijuana.

In the first week of February alone, three masked gunmen shot and killed a 26-year-old mother in broad daylight; two teenage boys carjacked a Lyft driver at gunpoint; and two shootings broke out less than a mile apart within an hour on the West Side.

Slutkin’s idea—the notion that civilians can help stop violence—has only found more backers since he founded CeaseFire, with proponents hoping that violence intervention will become a permanent part of the city’s gang-prevention infrastructure. Between 2017 and 2023, the budget for CVI programs increased at more than 15 times the rate of the Chicago Police Department budget.

In 2016, Powell Jobs co-founded a Chicago foundation with Arne Duncan, an Obama administration alumnus, called Chicago CRED (Create Real Economic Diversity). It’s now the linchpin of the city’s violence-protection infrastructure. What began with a $170,000 contribution from Powell Jobs’ philanthropy Emerson Collective has grown into a behemoth that spent more than $36 million in 2024.

Not only does CRED run its own programming for young men it deems at-risk, it is a magnet for philanthropic capital and a public advocate for expanding CVI funding at all levels.

Chicago police respond to a mass shooting on July 3, 2025. (Kyle Mazza/Anadolu via Getty Images)

 

Since its founding, CRED has “graduated” 730 participants out of a pool of more than 2,500, Peter Cunningham, the spokesperson for CRED, told me. Most of the individuals are former gang members (and some, current), though Cunningham noted he prefers the terms cliques or crews. In order to graduate, they must complete 18 to 24 months of programming, including trauma treatment, job training, and education for those without a high school degree, Cunningham said.

While the majority of the approximately 1,770 remaining participants are still active in CRED, Cunningham wrote in a text that others “have dropped out. Some moved away. Some got jobs and quit. Some are incarcerated. Some are no longer alive.”

In 2018, CRED helped launch what would become the most controversial arm of the city’s CVI apparatus: a program called FLIP (Flatlining Violence Inspires Peace). Young locals—many of whom have criminal records or are “justice-involved,” as CRED puts it—are paid to de-escalate conflict, monitor social media for gang tensions, and participate in daily check-ins regarding hot-spot activity. They eventually got rebranded as Peacekeepers. They wear neon vests and are meant to hang out in contested areas. When gang violence explodes, more than 1,000 Peacekeepers are sent to hot spots throughout the city to intervene. What began as a privately funded program under CRED is now a state-funded program, which received $33 million for this fiscal year.

In 2024, state- and city-funded entities performed more than 10,000 mediations, meaning a “third-party and one or more participants meet to reduce the likelihood of a conflict or to resolve a conflict,” according to the Government Alliance for Safe Communities, the interagency task force that distributes violence prevention funding in Chicago.

Chicago’s Peacekeepers have been deployed for Memorial Day weekend, a historically high time for shootings, and to help diffuse so-called “teen takeovers,” when teenagers flood downtown, wreaking havoc.

Peacekeepers are sometimes dispatched to the scene of a shooting in hopes of preventing retaliatory action.

That was the case on September 2, 2021, when Jacob Ellzey, a 48-year-old South Shore native, tried to mediate an ongoing dispute at a nearby apartment building. Two local families had been going at it for almost a month after an earlier shooting. He showed up that day hoping to cool tensions.

“I was trying to say, ‘Hey, let’s bridge the gap and move on from here,’ ” he recalled.

That’s when shots rang out. Ellzey told me he was shot five times, with one bullet shattering a leg bone.

“I thought I had calmed the situation to where I thought we could speak face-to-face, and it just didn’t work,” he said. “Sometimes it happens like that.”

More than four years later, he said the feud between the two parties rages on. He estimates that at least two others have been shot in the fallout.

In September, the Peacekeepers program became the subject of a national scandal after Governor J.B. Pritzker, a potential Democratic presidential hopeful, visited a CVI organization on the South Side. A video clip from that day shows him listening intently and nodding as a Peacekeeper explains why locals trusted him more than the police.

“I think one thing you said was they feel safe, or safer, around you,” the governor said.

Pritzker was all smiles as he shook hands and posed for photos with other CVI participants. Among them was a Peacekeeper named Kellen McMiller.

Governor J.B. Pritzker poses for photo with Peacekeeper Kellen McMiller (screen grab from footage provided by the Office of the Governor)

 

Six days later, McMiller allegedly helped steal nearly $700,000 in merchandise from the Louis Vuitton store on Michigan Avenue. One of the getaway cars collided with another vehicle while traveling 77 miles per hour. Mark Carlo Arceta, 40, was on his way to his shift at a nearby hospital’s animal research laboratory when he was killed in the crash. The next day, his fiancée gave birth to their son, naming him after his dead father.

Prosecutors charged McMiller and his six co-defendants with first-degree murder, retail theft, and burglary a few days later. When the news broke, McMiller had four active arrest warrants. Despite his criminal record, he was paid by the state—up to $600 a week—to try and prevent crime.

In a statement sent to media outlets after McMiller’s Chicago arrest, the governor’s office said it was “extremely troubled” but defended having felons in the program.

“We want people who’ve fallen into that lifestyle to work now to deter people from entering a life of crime,” Pritzker told reporters. (McMiller was indicted in October, and his next court appearance is scheduled for the end of the month.)

Others came to different conclusions in the wake of the incident. Alderman Hopkins, whose ward includes the strip of Michigan Avenue where Arceta was killed, is a believer in CVI—he said he used to serve on CeaseFire’s board in the ’90s. But the McMiller debacle, he said, exemplifies the program’s need for oversight.

“Every time we have some shadowy nonprofit agency that does nothing but take the money with no accountability and squander it or spend it on cars, it undermines the whole concept,” Hopkins said. “It’s very damaging to have incidents like this one.”

And McMiller is not the only example. Since January 2023—when the Peacekeepers program expanded from a summer initiative to a year-round operation—The Free Press found 28 additional arrests involving people who identified themselves as Peacekeepers or “violence interrupters” or wore Peacekeeper vests. The charges range from drug possession to violent assault.

In one case, police arrested a man for alleged heroin possession and unlawful possession of a firearm after finding him naked under his bed with $50,000 in cash nearby (he was later acquitted). In another, officers allegedly discovered 24 suspected ecstasy pills on a man who identified himself as a Peacekeeper who had been arrested for battery and resisting the police. Another police report describes a man who said he worked as a Peacekeeper who allegedly beat a woman unconscious, leaving her hospitalized with a brain hemorrhage. Another Peacekeeper, who told police he was a member of the Satan Disciples gang, was arrested twice within the span of 10 days.

(We couldn’t confirm the outcome of all the criminal proceedings.)

Duncan, the former education secretary under Barack Obama who now runs CRED, told me he recently fired one of their “star Peacekeepers” after she was arrested. “It broke my heart,” he said. “She may well not get convicted for what she was charged with, but you have to be held accountable.”

The arrests also include another Peacekeeper who posed with Pritzker that September day: Christopher D. Brown, who was arrested two months later for possession of cannabis over the legal limit and an unspecified controlled substance. It was his third arrest that year.

Steve Robinson, a Los Angeles police officer who married into the Crown family, one of Chicago’s wealthiest families, has been lobbying his brothers- and sisters-in-law to cut off funds to CRED and other CVI organizations. The multigenerational dynasty is worth billions, largely due to a long-standing share in defense contractor General Dynamics. The Arie and Ida Crown Memorial foundation gave an average of about $100 million annually to charities across the country between 2019 and 2024. Since 2020, more than $5.4 million of that has gone to CVI organizations, including CRED. The Crown family’s foundation did not respond to our request for comment.

Robinson said the money is just being wasted on gang members.

“I’m not saying it’s a universal truth, but the vast majority don’t change,” Robinson said. “Politicians and do-gooders get sucked into the rhetoric. ‘We’re different. We change. We can do good work.’ Bullshit.”

III. A Lost Cause?

In the eight weeks I spent reporting this story, I went to nearly every block on the South Side known for gun violence.

I went to O Block, the home turf of the Black Disciples, a gang that once executed an 11-year-old member. I visited the Dearborn Homes, the historical stronghold of the Mickey Cobras, a gang faction that arose in a maximum security state prison in the ’80s. And I walked around Englewood with a member of the Gangster Disciples, the mortal enemies of the Black Disciples.

I didn’t see a single Peacekeeper.

Devaughen Stringfellow wasn’t surprised.

He’s a former Gangster Disciple, who told me he was “born into” gang life.

“I was born around nothing but gangsters,” he said, standing in his Englewood backyard. “My mama was a gangster, my daddy was a gangster. My grandma was a gangster. Everybody was a gangster—I just grew up in it.”

Behind us is his tow truck’s transmission, placed atop a wooden stool. His truck is his prize possession—it’s his main source of income since Acclivus fired him, and a handful of other Peacekeepers, in 2024, due to a lack of funding, according to Acclivus.

In the five years he worked as a Peacekeeper, he said he started to feel like the program had lost its way. Many of his colleagues, he said, would often show up to the morning check-in, then disappear for the rest of the day.

“They ain’t doing nothing wrong but a lot of them ain’t doin’ shit, I ain’t gonna lie,” Stringfellow said. “Just getting a check,” he added.

Stringfellow told me he still believes in the concept of violence intervention—that locals with street cred can help prevent shootings in their neighborhoods—but that the Peacekeeper program has “gone to hell.” He complained of low wages for dangerous work, chronic absenteeism, and a culture that rewards friendship over merit.

Chicago police investigate a drive-by shooting on July 6, 2024, after a violent Fourth of July weekend that left 19 dead and dozens wounded. (Scott Olson via Getty Images)

 

“Anything that’s run by gang members and dope fiends, it’s all gonna be run the same,” Stringfellow said. (Acclivus did not respond to requests for comment regarding his claims.)

That’s not the case for David Murray, a 50-year-old violence interventionist, who told me he’s in Roseland most days, distributing free food and flyers.

“We do pop-ups in each neighborhood where there’s a shooting,” he said. “We go out there and set up for two or three hours, and just bless them with as much love as we can.”

Murray, a former member of the Mickey Cobras, said he feels like he’s making up for his past—and making a difference.

“Just the fact that I got some type of peace and solace, I feel like I’m doing the right thing,” he said.

Cunningham told me that while the paycheck might be what gets participants in the door, “Over time they realize the paycheck is the least important thing they gain from CRED. We want them to start earning money in the legal economy and understand what is possible.”

But Stringfellow told me that many of the men he used to work with reverted to their old behavior.

“They got to shoot-outs, robbin’, all of them end up in jail,” he said. “They ain’t had nothing else to do. So they got back to what they was used to doing.”

A life coach at CRED who works with troubled teens told me he was so sick of seeing participants sneak off to the bathroom to vape or doze on their desks that one session, he asked them: “Let’s keep it a buck: Who’s here for the money?”

He said about 40 percent of the class admitted that they were only there for the money, which Cunningham said is a weekly stipend that starts at $175.

I asked Cunningham about something I had heard—that participants had died on CRED property before. He confirmed that two men were killed on CRED’s property, with about 38 others having been shot or killed while enrolled with the organization.

Community violence intervention “only works because we engage with individuals at the highest risk of shooting or being shot,” Cunningham told me. “Most of our participants are still at risk even when they are in the program and every loss is an absolute tragedy. That is why we are trying to scale up CVI and reach a critical mass in the neighborhoods we serve.”

One victim was 28-year-old Ronnie Roper, who had been convicted several years earlier of a drug-related offense but was trying to change his life. On May 17, 2023, he was fatally shot in the parking lot of CRED’s Roseland facility.

A second life coach I spoke with was there that day.

He told me that he normally walked Roper to his car and “told him I loved him,” but that day he was “distracted” by a Zoom call.

“Next thing I know, all I heard was a bunch of noise. And they were saying somebody got shot.”

Paul Robinson, CRED’s chief program officer, told me CRED participants’ “lives are complicated, fraught with risk.” He said Roper was likely shot and killed “because of something he had done in the past.”

“Making a change is hard,” added LaQuay Boone, who helps run CRED’s programming. “So relapse is not simply expected—we know that it may happen.”

IV. The Big Business of Violence Intervention

Violence intervention is a sprawling enterprise in Illinois. There are interagency task forces, public and private partnerships, and entire state and city agencies dedicated to preventing gun violence.

There are two nonprofits with state grants to run Peacekeepers programs: Metropolitan Family Services and Acclivus, both of which distribute grants to smaller nonprofits that provide most of the boots on the ground. Acclivus is the smaller of the two, with a budget of about $13.5 million in 2023, more than 95 percent of which came from government grants.

Between 2021 and 2023, Acclivus distributed more than half a million dollars for “violence prevention” and “program support” to two entities whose connection to the cause is unclear.

A total of $323,567 went to True Star, a nonprofit that teaches youth the basics of digital content creation (the group did not respond to a request for comment). And $199,409 went to an LLC called I Said What I Said Podcast & Apparel, run by a man named Allen Toussaint Werner. The address listed on Acclivus’s tax filing was his personal home, a modest townhouse near Washington Park. When reached by phone, Werner declined to comment. Since late February, the LLC has been deemed “NGS” (not in good standing) by the state.

The spokesperson for Acclivus emailed that its grantees were selected through a “competitive, open application process.”

“All subgrantees and their funded projects are reviewed and approved by the appropriate state agency, including approval of budgets, program deliverables, as well as validation of their IRS designation and good standing status,” the spokesperson wrote.

All grant recipients, she added, are subject to “ongoing program and fiscal monitoring.” The spokesperson didn’t answer how a digital content and a podcast/clothing company had anything to do with shootings.

Police investigate a fatal shooting in Chicago’s Lawndale neighborhood on February 14, 2017, that killed a toddler and a young man and wounded a pregnant woman. (Scott Olson via Getty Images)

 

State audits uncovered by The Free Press reveal two different nonprofits that have misspent taxpayer dollars. Illinois regulators report that one nonprofit named Project H.O.O.D., a Peacekeepers subcontractor, spent $132,208 on “disallowed costs” out of $676,331 worth of state funds allocated between February 2022 and June 2024. That includes purchases at the Apple Store, vodka from Costco, and $3,750 worth of food from a taco truck. The state audit also lists $14,451 worth of gas cards as “non-personnel expenditures” that were itemized as supplies for “client support.”

“Vodka + tax, clothing for women, aleve, tequila + tax, and bodywash are items not listed in the approved budget,” the audit reads for one Costco purchase.

Desmond Marshall, the executive director of Project H.O.O.D., told me these costs were because an employee had “turned in the wrong receipt.” He added that the nonprofit was in the process of paying the funds back to the state and “remains committed to transparency, accountability, and the responsible stewardship of public resources.”

Robinson thinks his family’s money is better off being donated to other charities with a proven track record.

With Chicago’s violence intervention, “You often find out two or four years down the line that a program that said it helped out a couple hundred people, maybe only two or three of those people would still be considered a success,” Robinson said.

In 2020, Duncan, the head of CRED, wrote that the nonprofit was spending roughly $10 million annually in the Roseland and West Pullman neighborhoodsHe wrote that if $300 million were diverted away from the police force toward the remaining 13 neighborhoods they wanted to move into, it could “reimagine public safety.”

Yet according to a 2021 report from Northwestern University’s Institute for Policy Research, only 27 participants from Roseland and West Pullman who entered the program in 2019 had since graduated. That was out of an initial pool of 234 men.

Northwestern’s research (which receives funding from CRED) shows favorable CVI stats, including a 32 percent decrease in gunshot victimizations in hot spots manned by Peacekeepers in the 2025 fiscal year when compared to 2024. Another study from 2023 found that people in the violence-prevention program were 73.4 percent less likely to be arrested for a violent crime in the two years following their enrollment.

“We just had the fewest number of homicides in 60 years,” Cunningham wrote in an email. “There are clearly changes in behavior and that points to CVI. Something is clearly working.”

But to Robinson, the drop in crime should be credited to the work of the Chicago Police Department, which has stepped up its total arrest rates since 2022 and its clearance rates for most major crimes since 2023.

Even the faculty director of the lab, Andrew Papachristos, said he “could not attribute that reduction in shootings directly to the program.” But he added that Peacekeepers are “likely one of many factors at play in overall trends toward less gun violence.”

People in the violence-prevention program were 73.4 percent less likely to be arrested for a violent crime in the two years following their enrollment.

Alderman Michael Rodríguez, a Democrat representing Little Village, a Mexican American neighborhood on the South Side with Peacekeepers, said CVI nonprofits have helped turn his neighborhood around, even painting a mural in a nearby park and mentoring local kids. A billion dollars over a decade, he said, is a small price to pay for safer streets.

“When you think about the scale of the problem and the amount of lives that we’re saving at the end of the day, this is an economic investment,” Rodríguez said. “As long as they’re needed, I’ll be supportive.”

But Antoine Dobine, a 56-year-old former Gangster Disciple, said the only way to save lives is to focus on the kids, not the rehabilitation of young men.

“Why can’t we cut the bad tree down at the bottom, instead of trying to start at the top? The tree has already grown. Let’s nip it in the bud,” said Dobine, who runs a kids sports league, Hands Around the Hundreds.

Dionell Hill, a 41-year-old resident of Fuller Park, a Chicago area with one of the highest rates of shootings, said it took getting in trouble with the law for him to change his ways.

“I had to keep bumping my head. I got tired of being in trouble,” he said. “It’s about the fact, why are you putting your life at risk like that? I got tired of being broke.”

He said he needed to learn to provide for himself—not through stealing, but by installing drywall and rehabbing old businesses. CVI, he said, “ain’t doing nothing.”

Total Pageviews

GOOGLE ANALYTICS

Blog Archive