Now the people who
capitalized on the revolt against an indifferent American elite are in power,
and, shock of all shocks, they are even more indifferent than anyone who came
before them. The clubby deal-making and moral racketeering of the Epstein class
is now the United States’ governing philosophy.
How the Elite Behave
When No One Is Watching: Inside the Epstein Emails
Nov. 23, 2025
Mr.
Giridharadas is the author of “Winners Take All: The Elite Charade of Changing
the World” and the publisher of the newsletter The.Ink.
As journalists comb
through the Epstein emails, surfacing the name of one fawning
luminary after another, there is a collective whisper of “How could they?” How
could such eminent people, belonging to such prestigious institutions, succumb
to this?
A close read of the
thousands of messages makes it less surprising. When Jeffrey Epstein, a
financier turned convicted sex offender, needed friends to rehabilitate him, he
knew where to turn: a power elite practiced at disregarding pain.
At the dark heart of
this story is a sex criminal and his victims — and his enmeshment with
President Trump. But it is also a tale about a powerful social network in which
some, depending on what they knew, were perhaps able to look away because they
had learned to look away from so much other abuse and suffering: the financial
meltdowns some in the network helped trigger, the misbegotten wars some in the
network pushed, the overdose crisis some of them enabled, the monopolies they
defended, the inequality they turbocharged, the housing crisis they milked, the
technologies they failed to protect people against.
The Epstein story is resonating with a
broader swath of the public than most stories now do, and some in the
establishment worry. When Representative Ro Khanna, Democrat of
California, speaks of an
“Epstein class,” isn’t that dangerous? Isn’t that class warfare?
But the intuitions of
the public are right. People are right to sense that, as the emails lay bare,
there is a highly private merito-aristocracy at the intersection of government
and business, lobbying, philanthropy, start-ups, academia, science, high finance
and media that all too often takes care of its own more than the common good.
They are right to resent that there are infinite second chances for members of
this group even as so many Americans are deprived of first chances. They are
right that their pleas often go unheard, whether they are being evicted,
gouged, foreclosed on, A.I.-obsolesced — or, yes, raped.
It is no accident that
this was the social milieu that took Mr. Epstein in. His reinvention, after he
pleaded guilty to prostitution-related charges in Florida in 2008, would never have been possible without
this often anti-democratic, self-congratulatory elite, which, even when it
didn’t traffic people, took the world for a ride.
The emails, in my view,
together sketch a devastating epistolary portrait of how our social order
functions, and for whom. Saying that isn’t extreme. The way this elite operates
is.
The idea of an Epstein
class is helpful because one can be
misled by the range of people to whom Mr. Epstein ingratiated himself.
Republicans. Democrats. Businesspeople. Diplomats. Philanthropists.
Healers. Professors. Royals. Superlawyers. A person he emailed
at one moment was often at war with the ideas of another correspondent — a
Lawrence Summers to a Steve Bannon, a Deepak Chopra to a scientist skeptical of
all spirituality, a Peter Thiel to a Noam Chomsky. This diversity masked a
deeper solidarity.
What his correspondents tended to
share was membership in a distinctly modern elite: a ruling class in which
40,000-foot nomadism, world citizenship and having just landed back from Dubai
lend the glow that deep roots once provided; in which academic intellect is
prized the way pedigree once was; in which ancient caste boundaries have melted
to allow rotation among, or simultaneous pursuit of, governing, profiting,
thinking and giving back. Some members, like Mr. Summers, are embedded in all aspects of it;
others, less so.
If this neoliberal-era
power elite remains poorly understood, it may be because it is not just a
financial elite or an educated elite, a noblesse-oblige elite, a political
elite or a narrative-making elite; it straddles all of these, lucratively and
persuaded of its own good intentions. If it’s a jet set, it’s a
carbon-offset-private-jet set. After all, flying commercial won’t get you from
your Davos breakfast on empowering African girls with credit cards to your
crypto-for-good dinner in Aspen.
Many of the Epstein emails begin with a seemingly banal rite that, the
more I read, took on greater meaning: the whereabouts update and inquiry. In
the Epstein class, emails often begin and end with pings of echolocation. “Just
got to New York — love to meet, brainstorm,” the banker Robert Kuhn wrote to
Mr. Epstein. “i’m in wed, fri. edelman?” Mr. Epstein wrote to the billionaire
Thomas Pritzker (it is unclear if he meant a person, corporation or convening).
To Lawrence Krauss, a physicist in Arizona: “noam is going to tucson on the
7th. will you be around.” Mr. Chopra wrote to say he would be in New York,
first speaking, then going “for silence.” Gino Yu, a game developer, announced
travel plans involving Tulum, Davos and the D.L.D. (Digital Life Design)
conference — an Epstein-class hat trick.
Landings and takeoffs,
comings and goings, speaking engagements and silent retreats — members of this
group relentlessly track one another’s passages through JFK, LHR, NRT and
airports you’ve never even heard of. Whereabouts are the pheromones of this elite.
They occasion the connection-making and information barter that are its
lifeblood. If “Have you eaten?” was a traditional Chinese greeting, “Where are
you today?” is the Epstein-class query.
Their loyalty, it
appears, is less downward to people and communities than horizontal to fellow
members of their borderless network. Back in 2016, Theresa May, then the prime
minister of Britain, seemed to capture their essence: “If you believe you are a
citizen of the world, you are a citizen of nowhere.” Mr. Epstein’s
correspondents come alive far from home, freed from obligations, in the air,
ready to connect.
And the payoff can be real. Maintain,
as Mr. Epstein did, a grandmother-like radar of what a thousand people are
doing tomorrow and where, and you can introduce a correspondent needing a
lending partner to someone you’re seeing today. Or let Ehud Barak know a
Rothschild has the flu. Or offer someone else a jet ride back to New York and
reward the journalist who tipped you off by setting him up to meet a Saudi
royal.
But the whereabouts
missive is just the first flush of connection. Motion is the flirtation; actual
information, the consummation.
How did Mr. Epstein manage
to pull so many strangers close? The emails reveal a
barter economy of nonpublic information that was a big draw. This is not a
world where you bring a bottle of wine to dinner and that’s it. You bring what
financiers call “edge” — proprietary insight, inside information, a unique
takeaway from a conference, a counterintuitive prediction about A.I., a snippet
of conversation with a lawmaker, a foretaste of tomorrow’s news.
What the Epstein class
understands is that the more accessible information becomes, the more precious
nonpublic information is. The more everybody insta-broadcasts opinions, the
dearer is the closely held take. The emails are a private, bilateral social media
for people who can’t or won’t post: an archipelago of single-subscriber
Substacks. And in the need to maintain relevance by offering edge, a reader
detects thirst and swagger, desperateness and swanning.
“Saw Matt C with DJT at
golf tournament I know why he was there,” Nicholas Ribis, a former Trump Hotel
executive, wrote to Mr. Epstein, making what couples therapists call a bid for
attention. Jes Staley, then a top banking executive, casually mentioned a
dinner with George Tenet, the former Central Intelligence Agency director, and
got the reaction he probably hoped for: “how was tenet.” Mr. Summers laid bait
by mentioning meetings with people at SoftBank and Saudi Arabia’s sovereign
wealth fund. Mr. Epstein nibbled: “anyone stand out?” Then Mr. Summers could
offer proprietary intel. On it went: What are people saying? Who are you
hearing for F.B.I. director? Should I drop your name to Bill Clinton?
Sometimes these people give the
impression that their minds would be blown by a newspaper. Mr. Kuhn wrote to
Mr. Epstein: “Love to get your sense of Trump’s administration, policies.” And
while it may seem strange to rely on Mr. Epstein for political analysis when
you can visit any number of websites, for this class, insight’s value varies
inversely with the number of recipients. And the ultimate flex is getting
insider intel and shrugging: “Nthg revolutionary really,” the French banker
Ariane de Rothschild wrote during a meeting with Portugal’s prime minister.
Nomadic bat signals get things going, and edge keeps them flowing, while
underneath a deeper exchange is at work. The smart need money; the rich want to
seem smart; the staid seek adjacency to what Mr. Summers called “life among the
lucrative and louche”; and Mr. Epstein needed to wash his name using blue-chip
people who could be forgiving about infractions against the less powerful. Each
has some form of capital and seeks to trade. The business is laundering capital
— money into prestige, prestige into fun, fun into intel, intel into money.
Mr. Summers wrote to Mr.
Epstein: “U r wall st tough guy w intellectual curiosity.” Mr. Epstein replied:
“And you an interllectual with a Wall Street curiosity.”
In another email, Mr.
Epstein offered typo-strewn and false musings on climate science to Mr. Krauss,
including that Canada perhaps favored global warming, since it’s cold (it
doesn’t), and that the South Pole is actually getting colder (it’s melting rapidly).
Mr. Krauss let Mr. Epstein indulge in his rich-man theorizing while offering a
tactful correction and a hint that more research funding would help.
For this modern elite,
seeming smart is what inheriting land used to be: a guarantor of opened doors.
A shared hyperlink can’t stand alone; your unique spin must be applied. Mr.
Krauss sends his New Yorker article on militant atheism; Mr. Chomsky sends a
multiparagraph reply; Mr. Epstein dashes off: “I think religion plays a major
positive role in many lives. . i dont like fanaticism on either side. . sorry.”
This somehow leads to a suggestion that Mr. Krauss bring the actor Johnny Depp
to Mr. Epstein’s private island.
Again and again, scholarly types lower
themselves to offer previews of their research or inquiries into Mr. Epstein’s
“ideas.” “Maybe climate change is a good way of dealing with overpopulation,”
muses Joscha Bach, a German cognitive scientist.
The nature of this
omnidirectional capital exchange comes into special focus in the triangle of
emails among Mr. Epstein, Mr. Summers and his wife, Elisa New. Mr. Summers
seemingly benefited from Mr. Epstein’s hosting, tip-offs, semi-insight into
Trumpworld and, most grossly, dating advice many years into his marriage.
Ms. New sought Mr.
Epstein’s help contacting Woody Allen and revising her emails to invite people
on her televised poetry show. Mr. Epstein tutored her in elite mores and
motives: Don’t say, Come on my show; say, Join Serena Williams, Bill
Clinton and Shaq in coming on my show. Mr. Epstein reaped the
benefits of smarts by association in hanging around them, of the reputation
cleanse of affiliation with Harvard professors and a former Treasury secretary,
and of getting to cosplay as statesman, once sending an unsolicited intro email
to Mr. Summers and a Senegalese politician, Karim Wade, who, Mr. Epstein
informed Mr. Summers, is “the most charismatic and rational of all the africans
and has there respect.” There are 1.5 billion people and 54 countries in
Africa.
This class has its status games. One is, when getting a tip, to
block the blessing by saying you already know. Another is to apologize for
busyness by invoking centrality — “trump related issues occupying my time.”
When an intro is offered, the coldest reply is “no.” The ultimate power move is
from Mohamed Waheed Hassan of the Maldives, whose emails ended: “Sent from
President’s iPad.”
If you were an alien
landing on Earth and the first thing you saw was the Epstein emails, you could
gauge status by spelling, grammar, punctuation. Usage is inversely related to
power in this network. The earnest scientists and scholars type neatly. The wealthy
and powerful reply tersely, with misspellings, erratic spacing, stray commas.
The status games belie a truth,
though: These people are on the same team. On air, they might clash. They
promote opposite policies. Some in the network profess anguish over what others
in the network are doing. But the emails depict a group whose highest
commitment is to their own permanence in the class that decides things. When
principles conflict with staying in the network, the network wins.
Mr. Epstein may despise
what Mr. Trump is doing, but he still hangs with Steve Bannon, the Trump
whisperer and attack dog, seeking help on crypto regulation. Michael Wolff is a
journalist, but that doesn’t stop him from advising Mr. Epstein on his public image.
Kenneth Starr, who once doggedly pursued sexual misconduct allegations against
Mr. Clinton, reinvented himself as a defender of Mr. Epstein. These are
permanent survivors who will profit when things are going this way and then
profit again when they turn.
“What team are you
pulling for?” Linda Stone, a retired Microsoft executive, asked Mr. Epstein
just before the 2016 election.
“none,” he replied.
In one email, he
commiserates with Mr. Wolff about Mr. Bannon’s rhetoric; in another, he invites
Mr. Bannon over and suggests an additional guest — Kathryn Ruemmler, who served
as President Barack Obama’s White House counsel.
His exchanges with Ms.
Ruemmler are especially striking — not for the level of horridness, but for how
they portray this network at its most shape-shiftingly self-preservational, and
most indifferent to the human beings below.
Like so many, she had gone from
Obama-era public service to private legal practice, eventually becoming
the chief lawyer for
Goldman Sachs. That people move from representing the presidency to
representing banks is so normal that we forget the costs: the private job done
with the savvy to outfox one’s former public-sector colleagues, the public job
done gently to keep open doors.
In some exchanges in
2014, Ms. Ruemmler appears to be contemplating a job offer: attorney general of
the United States, according to contemporary reports. And who does
she seek advice from? A convicted sex offender.
In another email, Mr.
Epstein asks a legal question about whether Mr. Trump can declare a national
emergency to build a border wall. She responds that a prospective employer has
offered her a $2 million signing bonus. The glide from tyranny to bonus distills
a core truth: Regardless of what happens, the members of this social network
will be fine.
Ms. Ruemmler told Mr.
Epstein she was going to New York one day. “I will then stop to pee and get gas
at a rest stop on the New Jersey Turnpike, will observe all of the people there
who are at least 100 pounds overweight, will have a mild panic attack as a
result of the observation, and will then decide that I am not eating another
bite of food for the rest of my life out of fear that I will end up like one of
these people,” she wrote in 2015.
But in the class of
permanent survivors, today’s jump scare may yield to tomorrow’s opportunity. A
few years after she joined the company, Goldman Sachs declared anti-obesity
drugs a “$100 billion opportunity.”
Generally, you can’t read other people’s emails. Powerful people have private
servers, I.T. staffs, lawyers. When you get a rare glimpse into how they
actually think and view the world, what they actually are after, heed Maya
Angelou: Believe them.
American democracy today
is in a dangerous place. The Epstein emails are a kind of prequel to the
present. This is what these powerful people, in this mesh of institutions and
communities, were thinking and doing — taking care of one another instead of the
general welfare — before it got really bad.
This era has seen a
surge in belief in conspiracy theories, including about Mr. Epstein, because of
an underlying intuition people have that is, in fact, correct: The country
often seems to be run not for the benefit of most of us.
Shaming the public as
rubes for succumbing to conspiracy theories misses what people are trying to
tell us: They no longer feel included in the work of choosing their future. On
matters small and big, from the price of eggs to whether the sexual abuse of
children matters, what they sense is a sneering indifference. And a knack for
looking away.
Now the people who
capitalized on the revolt against an indifferent American elite are in power,
and, shock of all shocks, they are even more indifferent than anyone who came
before them. The clubby deal-making and moral racketeering of the Epstein class
is now the United States’ governing philosophy.
In spite of that, the unfathomably
brave survivors who have come forward to testify to their abuse have landed the
first real punch against Mr. Trump. In their solidarity, their devotion to the
truth and their insistence on a country that listens when people on the wrong
end of power cry for help, they shame the great indifference from above. They
point us to other ways of relating.
