Showing posts with label mike johnson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mike johnson. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 21, 2025

NEW INC. MAGAZINE COLUMN FROM HOWARD TULLMAN

 

Regulators in California made it difficult for insurers to raise rates despite increasing risks. So the insurers stopped writing policies, which is logical. But they’ll get blamed and shamed anyway. 

EXPERT OPINION BY HOWARD TULLMAN, GENERAL MANAGING PARTNER, G2T3V AND CHICAGO HIGH TECH INVESTORS @HOWARDTULLMAN1

JAN 21, 2025

In the tragic, painful aftermath of the latest California fires, there are plenty of lessons to be learned and lots of blame to spread around. And spreading blame may be the one thing that all the local government officials are truly best at. We’re not even counting the clods in Washington D.C., like Speaker Mike Johnson, who are also foaming at the mouth to spread some slime and flex their “conservative” credentials through extortionate demands for funding conditions while the fires are still burning.

We can expect the typical months of conversations, criticisms and complaints and ultimately, after all the grandstanding and garbage slinging, no concrete actions or improvements.

Then-President Biden made an immediate and kind gesture of promising millions in aid to the victims, but he’s already out the door. This generous offer was reminiscent of the bankrupt guy who takes a cab to the courthouse and then invites the cabbie inside as his newest creditor.

Someone else is going to have to pay the piper and the crook now in charge hasn’t paid a creditor for decades. Hopefully, the federal government will eventually step up and meet at least a portion of the massive support costs, property losses, and rebuilding expenses.

Let’s Blame the Insurers

Certainly, the insurers who are still active in California will take a huge hit. But beyond that, there’s going to be an enormous funding gap, which will adversely impact hundreds of thousands of lives. Still, I’m sure that we’ll hear that the ultimate villains turn out to be the insurers and the insurance industry. They represent such attractive and low-hanging fruit, and it’s so easy to blame someone else for the problems.

The reality of the wildfires is that we’re seeing one of the worst cases in history of “what comes around goes around”.     

First, millions of California residents are (and have been) uninsured or underinsured for many years. To save some money, they made very bad bet that their property and lives would be spared from the annual California catastrophes. This time around they lost. Big. As Warren Buffett said: “Only when the tide goes out do you discover who’s been swimming naked.”  And contrary to the stupid suggestions of Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) in this case, the tide and, in fact the entire ocean, was no help. The only thing that sucked was him. As an aside, thousands of new businesses, especially startups, make exactly the same kind of mistaken short-term decisions and don’t protect their businesses or their investors with appropriate insurance.

Why the Regulators Deserve the Real Blame

Second, the reason that so many residents were under- or uninsured is because for several years major insurers like State Farm have been reducing or eliminating coverage in California. Why?  Because the insurance regulators have been unwilling to let them to raise rates despite the higher risks of recurring natural disasters. Unfortunately, from a timing standpoint, many existing homeowners’ policies from multiple insurers were not renewed at year end– right before the fires hit.

While California is a huge and generally attractive market for insurers, much like Florida, as the underwriting risks and claims losses grow, it’s reasonable to expect less or even zero coverage in these states. The math can no longer add up;  even extraordinary rate increases are unlikely to cover historic-sized losses. 

Third, the alleged fallback protection for residents in California is a state-backed fund, the FAIR plan, which provides last-resort insurance coverage for all comers. Which is why the number of FAIR policies has exploded over the last several years. This sounds like a form of protection except that FAIR is undoubtedly insolvent given the expected losses from the fires—which are  yet to even be fully contained.

In a marvel of circularity, FAIR is replenished when needed by taxing the insurers doing business in the state based on their relative size. While the timeframe for the insurers to re-fund the FAIR coffers is not clear to me, it’s another obvious reason why the major insurers continue to shrink their book of business. They face the prospect of essentially paying twice for enormous losses and not receiving any premiums to offset the second tier of taxes. None of these plans in any of the states subject to floods, fires or hurricanes is sustainable over time.

Don’t Think It Can’t Happen to You–Do an Insurance Checkup

And, while the West Coast and its weather and water problems may seem many miles away from your own business and day-to-day operations, insurance availability and pricing in all respects are areas of concern and exposure that are going to impact all of us. Now’s the time to at least start thinking about it, asking questions of your own advisors and vendors, and taking whatever steps you can to best position yourself and your company for the future.

Everyone’s circumstances are different, but in my experience working with hundreds of companies over many years as well as with all the major insurers, here are a few things to ask yourself.          

·         Who is helping you address these exposures and risks.

Remember that an insurance agent works for the insurer and not for you. Their objectives and incentives are quite different from yours. It’s not dissimilar from both parties to a divorce proceeding who are foolish enough to think that their attorneys are representing them when in fact the attorneys are only representing themselves. As noted above, the insurers fully understand the growing risks and are more than incentivized to exclude, omit or otherwise avoid liability in as many instances as they can.

·         Do you ever read the provisions and exceptions in your policies?

Be honest. Every time there’s a renewal, it’s accompanied by changes, updates and additional exceptions and limitations to coverage and you never even look at those pieces of paper. This is exactly like the “terms and conditions” which every tech vendor loads into their documents and asks you to consent to without any understanding.

·         Do you even understand the new kinds of damage to your business and livelihood that are out there today? Are you covered?

Business interruption insurance has more holes and outs and exceptions than the finest chunk of Swiss cheese. Cybercrimes including scams, identity thefts and ransom demands are skyrocketing. Are you covered? One new area here is litigation by your own clients and customers for injuries they have allegedly suffered through their own fault or negligence but nevertheless want to blame on you. It doesn’t generally cost any less in litigation if you happen to be found not culpable. How about coverage for area-wide power and grid outages?

Bottom line: You don’t want to be asking these questions and getting the wrong answers after the fact. The time to build your boat is before the flood. Take the time now to have someone take a look at your own company’s situation.

Tuesday, September 24, 2024

STOP MAKING BIG TECH THE ENEMY

 

Stop Making Big Tech the Enemy

We're in a critical fight to stay ahead of China and India in A.I., yet our government and its regulators keep targeting the companies that are critical to winning. It's time we all played on the same team. 


Expert Opinion By Howard Tullman, General managing partner, G2T3V and Chicago High Tech Investors @howardtullman1

Sep 24, 2024

Election years are notorious for cheap stunts, useless hearings and the annually recurrent attacks on the tech and pharmaceutical industries. There's no lower-hanging fruit for these pointless pontificators than Big Bad Tech, and Big Pharma isn't far behind.

Nothing good ever comes of these abusive sessions except that they permit groups of know-nothing legislators to attempt to humiliate the leaders of some of the most important companies in America. They also consume loads of key management hours which - in these hyper-competitive times - is costly, counterproductive, and actively damaging to America's global market position.

Why anyone thinks these clown shows are productive has never been explained. Although in fairness, the price caps on insulin prices and prescription drugs that the Biden administration has executed are major and long-overdue accomplishments. They were so material and beneficial that the Orange Monster now claims that he was responsible for these new policies. He wasn't. The MAGAts had nothing whatsoever to do with it, but that's just another lie in Trump's vast portfolio of untruths.00:0001:49

The "gotcha" questions in these made-for-media harangues by idiots like MTG (R- GA), Lauren Boebert (R- CO) and James Comer (R-KY) are mostly for the benefit of right-wing cable networks. But they rarely result in anything more than displays of the ignorance of GOP hardliners. In 2018 Orin Hatch asked Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg how his company could sustain a business model where its users didn't pay for the service. Zuck answered, "Senator, we run ads." Congressman Louie Gohmert (R- TX) once opined that climate change legislation requiring climate-controlled environments for computers could affect the Earth's orbit.  It's often hard to tell the monkey from the organ grinder in these boring bouts of one-upmanship.

And remember when Fox host Bret Baier tried to gotcha Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg by asking him why Tesla wasn't invited to a White House session on tailpipe emissions? Imagine his surprise to learn that EVs don't have tailpipes. There's a quote attributed to Abe Lincoln that goes, "It's better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt." Apparently, there are plenty of politicos and pundits where Abe's warning never got through to its intended audience.

One of the most vocal and insufferable of these congressional clowns is coup conspirator "Gym" Jordan (R-Ohio) who at last count - over a six-year period - clocked more than 565 appearances on Fox and has written exactly zero pieces of legislation during that period. This idiot appears to be preparing additional hearings on nonsensical subjects and is once again planning to seek the speakership in the House if Mike Johnson, the current holder, falls by the wayside because he partnered with the Democrats to avoid the pre-election government shutdown that Trump has been demanding.

Intelligent people might simply ignore these theatrics and the millions of dollars shredded by these stupid shows, but sadly the constant noise and attacks have had two more serious and destructive effects. They have turned substantial portions of the public against the tech industry and they have encouraged and empowered long and very costly litigation by various governmental and regulatory agencies with their own agendas, who never seem to learn their lessons either.

In a digitally connected and fundamentally borderless world of increasing global competition, our own government continues to be short-sighted enough to sue, hamstring and interfere with the operations of our best and brightest businesses in a number of critical tech areas. Decades wasted in pursuit of Microsoft led nowhere, just as breaking up AT&T did absolutely nothing to help the consumer. Threats to break up Amazon and spin out AWS are a bad joke, especially since AWS presently operates more of the U.S. government's back-end computing power than the government itself. The next obvious and very precarious battlefront - with the meetings and hearings already starting - is going to be artificial intelligence, where our edge is already being seriously challenged by China and India.

Only five or six major U.S. tech companies are sufficiently resourced to do battle on our country's behalf in these massive, expensive and complex technology spaces. I've previously explained how challenging it is for smaller operators, entrepreneurs and new business builders to go up against the power and ubiquity of these major players. And that contest seems to be largely over already. Nothing that the U.S. government does in the way of trying to restrict or interfere with their growth is likely to help us in the long run.    

It doesn't take an A.I. prompt engineer to figure out that it's not really a fair fight when the government is on one side of the battle, even if the biggest and most successful tech companies in the U.S. are on the other. And, sadly for our country, it's a more obvious problem and threat when the government in question isn't even ours. The officials and regulators of the People's Republic of China are sponsoring, funding and leading the charge against the U.S. tech industry on behalf of their own China-based businesses as they try to compete with us in the critical industries of the future - especially in the area of artificial intelligence.    

Instead of the government tearing these tech leaders down with stupid hearings and pointless litigation and further slowing our country's growth and initiatives in A.I., we need our political leaders to implement programs and strategies that permit and encourage collaboratives, consortiums, and other shared efforts to put all our resources behind a concentrated effort and a single goal - a U.S. win. Or we can count on being overtaken and outrun by China in the A.I. global marketplace.  

Total Pageviews

GOOGLE ANALYTICS

Blog Archive