Monday, February 13, 2023

NEW INC. MAGAZINE COLUMN BY HOWARD TULLMAN

 

  

The Write Way to Develop Our Kids

ChatGPT has people fearing that students will adapt it to cheat. They're missing the point. We need to teach them actual writing, which helps youngsters to learn how to think, organize and execute-- important business skills that have faded in the iPhone generation. 


BY HOWARD TULLMAN, GENERAL MANAGING PARTNER, G2T3V AND CHICAGO HIGH TECH INVESTORS@TULLMAN

There's so much misguided press and frantic conversations about ChatGPT and its clones writing papers for high school and college students that it makes me wonder how so many "literates" and arguably educated folks can be completely missing the central concern.

The authenticity of the ultimate composition is only part of the education equation - and maybe not even the most important part. The essence of composition is a series of careful and creative steps: selecting a subject; assembling the facts and arguments you want to share; organizing your thoughts in an orderly fashion; and then clearly, concisely, and convincingly setting them down and communicating them. There may be a fast-approaching time when the physical part of this process-- the assembly of the material and an outline of its contents -- can be done mechanically and competently by machines. But it has nothing to do with how we need to be educating our kids and preparing them to be a valuable part of our future workforce.

This is the exact same conversation we have with parents who insist that they want their kids to learn code in school and who don't necessarily appreciate that it's not about learning the specific code -- which will be outdated and superseded in seconds. Writing code is really about learning how to think about the problem being solved by the programs being built and the best ways to accomplish the goals of the project. That's what really matters. 

All these articles -- which generally assume that our kids are inclined to be lazy, arrogant and crooked -- are also too often focused primarily on the foolish question of whether the AI-invented (or stolen) output can successfully fool the faculty, as if that was the ultimate objective. As if the faculty members were utterly incapable -- by simply asking a question or two of any suspected students -- of determining whether the accused are actually guilty of the crime. It's really no harder than figuring out whether Mom or Dad helped Junior do his math homework last night, an age-old and traditional inquiry every teacher has mastered.

But what's really sad is how these self-appointed and overly concerned guardians of the integrity of our educational institutions -- most of whom have never taught anything -- are missing the point.  It's the end-to-end process of effective writing, not necessarily the resultant product, that we're trying to teach our kids to learn, and to do well.  And, just to be clear, we're doing a fairly miserable job of at the moment. We're teaching our kids to type, but not to write.

We see college graduates entering the workforce who require months of remedial instruction and who couldn't compose a simple business letter or proposal if their life and livelihood depended on it. Honestly, stream of consciousness spews haven't been in vogue since James Joyce; no one wants to read your feelings vomited out on the page.  I've been harshly critical of rappers over their content, but they certainly understand that their screeds have to have some pace and structure to make sense, along with a dollop of Mom's spaghetti.

Unfortunately, in the name of freedom, flexibility, art and creativity, too many college grads these days have been taught that they're free to discard the rigor and rules of good writing as the toxic demands of the white privileged, and to write however and whatever they choose. It seems to be more about hubris than homework. Everyone wants to be on a winning team, but no one wants to come to practice.

This permissiveness makes for mush and it's not that much different from what I used to tell young artists when I served on the board of the New York Academy of Art, as well as new employees who insisted on doing their own thing: learn to write properly first, and then ignore it eventually if you choose. Too much imagination - too little skill. Feelings aren't everything -- art is nothing without form. Creativity without craft and constraints equals crap.

Whether it's the fault of our schools, the sins of spellcheck, the arrogance of auto-fill or just the complete devaluation of writing as a crucial business communication tool, we've really dropped the ball on making it clear to our kids that being a good writer is a crucial part of being a good citizen and good person as well. Writing is vital to our intellectual growth. Dreaming about things being better is okay, but writing those dreams down makes them concrete and putting them in action makes them real. Don't just think it. Ink it. Putting your dreams on paper is like stirring the embers of your life into a fire.

Writing is a powerful and rewarding discipline -- great when you finally get it right, and torture the rest of the time. At least for me. Editing is even worse, although there's a real appeal to the successive approximation that draws you constantly closer to the final achievement. If young people don't learn early on that the things in life that they'll come to value are those that they've worked hardest to achieve, then they'll never understand that if you don't put the work into something you'll never know the true worth of it.

Writing is our way of repairing ourselves. The routine of daily writing, the rigor of edit and review, and the power of iteration and continual refinement are powerful ways to offset the daily, unceasing noise, the constant dopamine distractions and the utter lack of focused attention that is killing our ability to concentrate.  Even worse, the clutter and noise are slowly destroying our kids' ability to learn. They're insatiably curious to know everything about nothing worth knowing. They don't care what's on the screen; they want to know what else is on. Kids with remote controls are like ferrets on double expresso.

Drugs won't help, but a daily dose of patient and painstaking attention to the details and demands of creating and crafting something of style and substance might just do the trick. If it's not handwritten, by the way, it's probably not worth doing. There's a power and an emotional connection to the care and beauty of cursive (and all forms of calligraphy) that we're also on the cusp of losing forever. Clever fonts and emojis will never cut it.

Start small. Get your kids a notebook or a diary, sit them down first thing in the morning each day, and ask them to write three pages of anything. Check out the Morning Pages concept from Julia Cameron, which isn't just for artists. It's almost as effective a protocol as Jack Dorsey's daily ice baths in terms of providing an energizing kickstart for the rest of the day.

Our kids and our employees are all in a hurry to be bosses, creators, inventors, entrepreneurs, and celebrities. They've been convinced that there are tricks of the trade and painless shortcuts to such success if they can only find them, but true success knows no shortcuts. They want to be alive, always on, excited and thrilled in every way because that's the false and rotten dream they've been sold by social media -- the toilet of the Internet. They're told that they must be "inspired" and bring their "whole" selves to every occasion. But it's not the Hokey Pokey.

We need to tell them to slow down and wake up. And we need to tell them what every great writer (but not ChatGPT) will tell them about writing and inspiration: You don't sit down to write because you're inspired; you become inspired because you sit down to write. Each day and every day.

MAGAt PIGS AND TRAITORS

 


Saturday, February 11, 2023

SUCK ON THIS YOU STUPID MAGAt MORONS

 


Is It Too Late to Save Chicago From Progressive Misrule?

 

Is It Too Late to Save Chicago From Progressive Misrule?

The city has gone downhill fast but it isn’t clear voters are ready to turn the page on Lori Lightfoot.

By Collin Levy

Follow

Feb. 10, 2023 1:59 pm ET

 

The Windy City is in unusually bad shape. Crime is up but the statistics don’t capture Chicagoans’ true concern about the collapse of public order. Taxes are high, pensions are underfunded, businesses are leaving, and unions are gaining unprecedented power in a city they already dominate. So it’s hardly a surprise that the mayor’s race has become a free-for-all.

Nine candidates, including incumbent Mayor Lori Lightfoot, are trying to distinguish themselves on the big issues of troubled schools, city finances and law enforcement. Their platforms are a progressive punchbowl. One candidate wants a tax on the suburbs; another proposes a “public bank.” But the issue that really matters is crime. Voters want to know: Is anyone here going to save the city from its slow-motion demise?

Three candidates—Ms. Lightfoot, former Chicago Public Schools CEO Paul Vallas, and U.S. Rep. Jesus “Chuy” Garcia—are currently in a dead heat for the lead, followed by Cook County Commissioner Brandon Johnson, businessman Willie Wilson, Alderman Sophia King and community activist Ja’Mal Green. The slate will face off in a primary on Feb. 28. If no candidate wins a majority, the top two will compete in a runoff on April 4. The primary is technically nonpartisan, but in Chicago that doesn’t matter. All nine candidates are Democrats.

Ms. Lightfoot’s tenure has been marked by Covid and crime. Her combative personality was appealing when she was an outsider, but it has left her this time without a natural constituency. Her current approval rating is 22% among likely voters, and 71% think the city is on the wrong track, according to a WBEZ poll. In 2019 she won every ward in the city.

Those bleak numbers have created an opening for Mr. Vallas, a candidate whose positions on public order and city finances are a throwback to an earlier, more practical era of Chicago Democratic politics. His reputation as a budget guy and turnaround specialist with policy expertise, derived from stints running large school districts in Chicago, Philadelphia and the Recovery School District of Louisiana, earned him the endorsement of the Chicago Tribune, which called him smart and “unapologetically wonkish.”

Mr. Vallas’s rise in the polls to around 18% is reflected in the missiles now coming his way. Ms. Lightfoot says he isn’t speaking up enough on abortion (he’s pro-choice). Mr. Garcia says he is a conservative “wolf in sheep’s clothing.” But nothing seems to stick. Since Jan. 1, Mr. Vallas has raised $2.4 million, compared with $829,000 for Mr. Garcia, $751,000 for Mr. Johnson and $739,000 for Ms. Lightfoot, according to political consultant Frank Calabrese.

Why? Residents are less preoccupied with the usual ideological flashpoints than they are with the sense that crime is spiraling out of control. Carjackings and retail theft are common, lotion is locked up at Walgreens and some neighborhoods have hired private security patrols. At the end of 2022, Michigan Ave., Chicago’s high-end shopping strip, had retail vacancies around 30%, says Cushman & Wakefield.

Ms. Lightfoot’s approach has been more defensive than constructive. In summer 2022, McDonald’s CEO Chris Kempczinski gave a speech affirming his company’s commitment to Chicago but noting that crime in the city is a “crisis” and high taxes are driving out other major companies like BoeingCaterpillar and hedge fund Citadel. It was a cry for help, but Ms. Lightfoot kicked sand in Mr. Kempczinski’s face, telling him to “educate himself” before he speaks.

In February she reached out to the business community, telling them they should “champion” the city and that she is open to more cooperation. That would make her a better second-term mayor, but it sounds like an offer of conciliation out of desperation. Who knows if she means it?

Mr. Vallas pitches himself as the law-and-order candidate with the slogan that “public safety is a human right.” He has done pro-bono work on contract talks for the Fraternal Order of Police and has the endorsement of the Chicago Police Union. Voters may wager he has a better shot at getting the city back on track than Ms. Lightfoot, who cut the police budget in 2020. Politically, she owns the crime wave.

The other big issue is the city’s public schools. The teachers unions, which supported Mr. Garcia in 2015, have this time put their money behind Mr. Johnson, a former teacher. Since joining the race in October, around 97% of Mr. Johnson’s roughly $2.4 million in contributions have come from the American Federation of Teachers (of which the Chicago Teachers Union is Local 1) and the Service Employees International Union.

If he doesn’t make it to the runoff, and Mr. Garcia does, count on the CTU support flowing Mr. Garcia’s way. The teachers’ contract is up for renegotiation in 2024, so this year’s campaign money is meant to ensure they will be negotiating with a friendly mayor. A new contract could set conditions for five years or even longer.

The most under-discussed issue of the race is the city’s finances and public pensions, which are among the worst funded in the nation, according to the Illinois Policy Institute. But fixing that will require great relations with Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker and a first-rate ground game in Springfield. Ms. Lightfoot has neither.

Have Chicagoans had enough of progressive misrule? Might they finally turn to a centrist Democrat to put an end to the crime and disorder that is ruining civic life? Over the years, blue cities like Seattle, Los Angeles and New York have episodically swung to the center. But only when things got so bad that progressivism’s bold promises and good intentions were no longer believable.

A new Lightfoot campaign ad includes footage from a 2009 interview with Mr. Vallas saying. “I’m more of a Republican than a Democrat. . . . If I ran for public office, then I would be running as a Republican.” In most years, this would be a ticket to political oblivion in Chicago. In 2023 it could be the kind of change the city chooses—and needs.

Ms. Levy is a member of the Journal’s editorial board.

IT'S GETTING BETTER AND BETTER...SHE'S A SHAMELESS MONKEY

 


Total Pageviews

GOOGLE ANALYTICS

Blog Archive