Monday, December 01, 2025

SYKES

 

The Silence of the Canaries

Trump has normalized xenophobia

Charlie Sykes

Dec 01, 2025

Dead Canary Stock Photos, Pictures & Royalty-Free Images - iStock

 

We hear a lot about the canaries in the coal mine these days. But we were reminded last week that dead canaries are littered all around us. We never imagined that death could undo so many.1

Happy Monday.

This. Is. Not. A. Drill. To the Contrary is a reader-supported publication. No spin, no BS, no merch. Just straight, sober, sane, and snarky commentary. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Last week, Donald Trump observed Thanksgiving with a nakedly racist rant that was unhinged even by Trumpian standards (more about that below). Reacting to the shooting of two National Guardsmen in Washington DC, Trump announced a “permanent pause” in immigration from poorer countries. Trump’s animus quickly became policy. The administration paused all visas for Afghans, and then closed the door on all asylum decisions, “until we can ensure that every alien is vetted and screened to the maximum degree possible.”

But that hardly captures the virulent malice of his Thanksgiving diatribe.

Just days after he called for the death penalty for prominent Democrats, Trump called the governor of Minnesota “severely retarded” and railed against immigrants from Third World countries.

He threatened to “denaturalize” migrants who had become citizens and endorsed the far-right policy of “remigration”— as he lashed out at Afghans and (for some unfathomable reason) Somalis.

But Trump’s ban has been met by virtual crickets from the GOP; and his tirade has all but vanished from the news cycle.

**

This was not always the case.

In December 2015, Trump called for “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on.”

Ten years ago, there were still elected Republicans who pushed back: “Donald Trump’s Muslim ban plan plunges Republican party into chaos.”

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump was disowned by his own party’s top leadership on Tuesday and faced calls to drop his White House bid as the world reacted with outrage to his plan for a ban on Muslims entering the United States.

“This is not conservatism,” Speaker Paul Ryan declared. “What was proposed yesterday is not what this party stands for. And more importantly, it’s not what this country stands for.” Mitt Romney, the 2012 Republican nominee for president, backed Ryan, his former running mate, adding on Twitter: “On Muslims, @realDonaldTrump fired before aiming...@SpeakerRyan is on target.”

There was, in fact, a chorus of denunciation.

Mitch McConnell, the Senate Majority Leader, called the idea “completely and totally inconsistent with American values.” In that distant (and more innocent) time, a pre-fluffing Lindsey Graham was withering in his criticism, calling the proposal “un-American” and accusing Trump of “helping the enemy of this nation” by aiding in Islamic State recruitment. Marco Rubio called the proposal “impulsive and reckless,” saying it “violates the Constitution” and “is not the best way to face this threat.” Future Trump chief of staff Reince Priebus, who was then chairman of the RNC, also denounced Trump’s Muslim ban, saying: “I don’t agree. We need to aggressively take on radical Islamic terrorism but not at the expense of our American values.”

In 2015, Former VP Dick Cheney was beginning his long-term break with Trump.

“Well, I think this whole notion that somehow we need to say no more Muslims and just ban a whole religion goes against everything we stand for and believe in,” Cheney told conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt. “I mean, religious freedom’s been a very important part of our history.”

**

Even in 2017, there was some (more muted) pushback when Trump said that there were “very fine people on both sides” at a Charlottesville rally where white nationalists chanted “Jews will not replace us.”

Before he placed his conscience in cold-storage, Lindsey Graham (again) issued a statement saying Trump’s words were “dividing Americans, not healing them” and that he took a “step backward by again suggesting there is moral equivalency”. Paul Ryan (still Speaker of the House) emphasized there could be “no moral ambiguity” and that “white supremacy is repulsive”. GOP Senator Cory Gardner from Colorado tweeted, “Mr. President, we must call evil by its name. These were white supremacists, and this was domestic terrorism”. Senate leader McConnell again pushed back, issuing a statement declaring “there are no such thing as ‘very fine people’ among white supremacists, neo-Nazis and the KKK”. Romney also pushed back against the president, saying that “whether he intended to or not, what he communicated caused racists to rejoice, minorities to weep, and the vast heart of America to mourn,” and suggested Trump should apologize. Even Marco Rubio tweeted that Trump “can’t allow #WhiteSupremacists to share only part of blame”.

But the chorus —- and the GOP conscience — was already fading.2 One by one the canaries were being asphyxiated.

In 2016, there was widespread outrage when Trump bragged about grabbing women by the pussy, but having accepted that, the GOP fell silent as Trump was found liable for sexual assault and was convicted of felonies for paying off a porn star.

A similar silence descended around his obsession with the Big Lie about the 2020 election, his role in fomenting a seditious conspiracy to attack the Capitol, and his increasingly violent rhetoric about political opponents.

Consider:

When was the last time anybody mentioned that Trump once explicitly called for the Constitution to be suspended so he could be restored to power? Just three years ago, he posted:

A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution.

Image

 

This was not a one-off. As Mike Pence’s former chief of staff, Marc Short noted on Meet the Press, Trump’s attack on the Constitution was consistent with “what he asked the vice president to do two years ago, when rioters were attacking the Capitol and he asked the vice president to overturn the election results.”

Days later, Trump doubled down, firing off a declaration that: “UNPRECEDENTED FRAUD REQUIRES UNPRECEDENTED CURE!”

In other words, Goddam right I orchestrated a coup to overthrow the Constitution — and I’ll do it again!

On Earth 2.0 (a rational and totally imaginary world), this would be the clearest, easiest, most obvious moment for Republicans to rid themselves of this troublesome and deranged demagogue.

Prominent Republicans would deliver major speeches rejecting (1) sedition, (2) collaboration with Nazis, and (3) the former president’s call to terminate the Constitution, so he can be reinstated.

“No honest person can now deny that Trump is an enemy of the Constitution,” Liz Cheney tweeted. Her fellow J6 Committee member, Adam Kinzinger called out his fellow Republicans: “With the former President calling to throw aside the constitution,” he said, “not a single conservative can legitimately support him, and not a single supporter can be called a conservative. This is insane. Trump hates the Constitution.”

But here was the headline of the day: “Top Republicans stay silent on Trump’s call to terminate the Constitution.”

Because, of course. And check out this pathetic dingleberry: “Trump’s call to suspend Constitution not a 2024 deal-breaker, leading House Republican says.”

**

Which brings us to Trump’s squalid Thanksgiving Day rant….

Trump’s Thanksgiving Rant: Annotated

Let’s walk through the president’s social media post.

TRUMP: A very Happy Thanksgiving salutation to all of our Great American Citizens and Patriots who have been so nice in allowing our Country to be divided, disrupted, carved up, murdered, beaten, mugged, and laughed at, along with certain other foolish countries throughout the World, for being “Politically Correct,” and just plain STUPID, when it comes to Immigration.

The holiday-inspired insults are a feature of Trump’s messages to the nation. But he followed it with a Stephen-Miller-style attack on immigration

The official United States Foreign population stands at 53 million people (Census), most of which are on welfare, from failed nations, or from prisons, mental institutions, gangs, or drug cartels. They and their children are supported through massive payments from Patriotic American Citizens…

Fact-check:

A strong body of recent research finds that immigration is, on balance, a net positive for U.S. economic growth and labor‑force expansion: several analyses estimate lower GDP growth if immigration falls (e.g., a 0.3–1.0 percentage‑point reduction in 2025 across studies) and attribute sizable contributions to job and output gains.

See also: How Does Immigration Affect the U.S. Economy? | Council on Foreign Relations

And:

Immigrants punch above their weight in the U.S. economy: Real contribution to economic output compared with...

A screenshot of a paper

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

 

TRUMP: They put up with what has happened to our Country, but it’s eating them alive to do so! A migrant earning $30,000 with a green card will get roughly $50,000 in yearly benefits for their family.

False.

The claim that a migrant earning $30,000 with a green card will get roughly $50,000 in yearly benefits for their family is falseLegal immigrants are barred mainly from most federal welfare programs for their first five years. The Biden administration has sought to expand ways for migrants to come to the U.S. legally, including a program for migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela who have American sponsors. Unauthorized migrants aren’t eligible for many types of federal aid, although some states have extended social service programs to include them.

TRUMP: This refugee burden is the leading cause of social dysfunction in America, something that did not exist after World War II (Failed schools, high crime, urban decay, overcrowded hospitals, housing shortages, and large deficits, etc.).

More bullshit.

The statement that “this refugee burden is the leading cause of social dysfunction in America, something that did not exist after World War II (Failed schools, high crime, urban decay, overcrowded hospitals, housing shortages, and large deficits, etc.)” is not supported by evidence. Experts agree that increased immigration leads to higher housing demand, but evidence does not support the idea that immigrants are a primary driver of high housing costs. The main factor affecting housing affordability is a home shortage caused by years of underbuilding and restrictive zoning. An interest rate surge exacerbated the problem. The number of immigrants illegally in the U.S. is less than half the number cited by Trump, and although increased immigration leads to higher housing demand, evidence does not support the idea that immigrants are a primary reason for surging housing costs.

TRUMP: As an example, hundreds of thousands of refugees from Somalia are completely taking over the once great State of Minnesota. Somalian gangs are roving the streets looking for “prey” as our wonderful people stay locked in their apartments and houses hoping against hope that they will be left alone.

Trump has built his political career on attacking dark-skinned migrants — from his 2015 comment about Mexican “rapists” to last year’s attack on Haitians. Here Trump veers off to attack another specific group of brown-skinned migrants.

“As far as demonizing our Somali community, maybe, he could help us on some things,” [Minnesota Governor Tim Walz told host Kristen Welker on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “Demonizing an entire community, folks who are in the professions, educators, artists, doctors, lawyers, entrepreneurs, they bring the diversity and the energy to a place like Minnesota.”

TRUMP: The seriously retarded Governor of Minnesota, Tim Walz, does nothing, either through fear, incompetence, or both…

Trump’s use of the word “retarded” sparked a significant national backlash, including from one Indiana Republican who revolted on Trump’s gerrymandering push over the slur. But few other Republicans bothered to comment.

TRUMP: “while the worst “Congressman/woman” in our Country, Ilhan Omar, always wrapped in her swaddling hijab, and who probably came into the U.S.A. illegally in that you are not allowed to marry your brother, does nothing but hatefully complain about our Country, its Constitution, and how “badly” she is treated, when her place of origin is a decadent, backward, and crime ridden nation, [in the past past Trump has referred to “shit-hole countries] which is essentially not even a country for lack of Government, Military, Police, schools, etc.

Why Omar? Why do you think? She has been a longtime obsession for Trump, whose supporters chanted “send her back.”

Nota bene: This is not the first time that the MAGA right has tied Omar to Afghan refugees. Back in 2021, Charlie Kirk claimed that Biden intentionally let Afghanistan fall because he “wants a couple hundred thousand more Ilhan Omars to come into America to change the body politic permanently.” (Omar is Somali, not Afghan, but they were all pretty much the same to Kirk.)

TRUMP: Even as we have progressed technologically, Immigration Policy has eroded those gains and living conditions for many. I will permanently pause migration from all Third World Countries to allow the U.S. system to fully recover, terminate all of the millions of Biden illegal admissions, including those signed by Sleepy Joe Biden’s Autopen,..

A clear echo of his original Muslim ban but now including migrants who legally entered the country.

TRUMP: …and remove anyone who is not a net asset to the United States, or is incapable of loving our Country, end all Federal benefits and subsidies to noncitizens of our Country, denaturalize migrants who undermine domestic tranquility, and deport any Foreign National who is a public charge, security risk, or non-compatible with Western Civilization.

Note the sweeping grounds for stripping naturalized citizens of their US citizenship.3 “Undermine national tranquility”? “Non-compatible with Western Civilization”?

WTAF?

TRUMP: These goals will be pursued with the aim of achieving a major reduction in illegal and disruptive populations, including those admitted through an unauthorized and illegal Autopen approval process.

So not just “illegal.” Again, he does not define “disruptive”. Does it include social media posts critical of the Administration? Or participation in protests that are otherwise protected by the First Amendment?

TRUMP: Only REVERSE MIGRATION can fully cure this situation. Other than that, HAPPY THANKSGIVING TO ALL, except those that hate, steal, murder, and destroy everything that America stands for — You won’t be here for long!

His embrace of “remigration” went from rant to official policy a matter of hours…

A screenshot of a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

 

“The stakes have never been higher, and the goal has never been more clear: Remigration now,” the Department of homeland Security posted on X.

What is “remigration,” you ask? Via Wikipedia:

“Remigration is a European far-right concept of ethnic cleansing[1] via the mass deportation of non-white minority populations, especially immigrants and sometimes including those born in Europe and holding European citizenship, to their place of racial ancestry.[2][3]

“Originating in Europe, the concept has spread to the United States and other countries, and it is popular especially within the Identitarian movement.[4][5]

“Some proponents of remigration suggest excluding some persons with non-European background from such a mass deportation, based on a varyingly defined degree of assimilation into European culture.”

The reaction from elected Republicans? Zip. Bupkus. Crickets.

**

Exit take: As recently as a few years ago, there would have been Republican voices denouncing Trump’s bizarre and unAmerican attacks on immigrants. Those voices were the canaries in the coal mine. Their silence now tells us what has been lost.

KEGS-BREATH

 




 







Trump Fury Erupts at NYT as Mental Decline Visibly Worsens

 



Transcript: Trump Fury Erupts at NYT as Mental Decline Visibly Worsens

As Trump’s rage at the paper of record reveals too much, the author of a piece on Trump as a “lame duck dictator” explains how devastating it is for him that his carefully cultivated illusion of strength is collapsing.

 

Greg Sargent: This is The Daily Blast from The New Republic, produced and presented by the DSR Network. I’m your host, Greg Sargent. 

President Trump is very very angry about New York Times piece that carefully documents his obvious physical decline. Trump raged over the piece, letting out a stream of lies about his performance in office and even attacking the reporter who wrote the piece as ugly. This may seem typical of Trump, but we think it gets at something deeper. Trump’s entire political mystique is premised on the fiction that he’s a strong, virile, formidable figure who wields absolute mastery over his enemies at all times. His defensive eruption shows that he knows that the second his aura of strength is deflated and he comes to be seen as a shriveled, floundering figure, his whole political house of cards is in danger of collapsing. David Lurie, a lawyer who writes for the Public Notice Substack, has a good new piece developing a framework that describes Trump as a “lame duck dictator.” So we’re getting into all this today. David, thanks for coming on. 

David Lurie: Thanks for having me, Greg. 

Sargent: So The New York Times piece is pretty devastating. It talks about how Trump has been dozing off at events, how he’s traveling a good deal less than he used to, how he’s seen in public less often. There’s this brutal video of him embedded in the piece looking exhausted and befuddled. He comes to the Oval Office for work at 11 a.m. The piece even implied that Trump is now eyeing the great beyond. David, what did you make of this piece?

Lurie: Well, Greg, on the one hand, the piece was quite gentle to Trump because it avoided the elephant in the room, which is his very evident and advancing state of dementia. But it also was devastating for the reasons that you observed, because his sheer and pervasive state of exhaustion and his ever more inescapable showing of his age is exactly what Trump cannot abide. It’s devastating precisely because it was so factual. The video was perhaps the most devastating part of it, as was the very accurate description of the truly bizarre—I think historically bizarre—moment when a pharmaceutical executive collapsed next to Trump and he—in a state of bewilderment mixed with the apparent desire to remain the center of attention—stood up from his chair and then stared into the void. So it’s a devastating piece, and it’s devastating because of its factuality in my view.

Sargent: Well, I think you raise a really important point in saying that it, if anything, danced around the elephant in the room, which is that he is in a state of serious mental decline as well. We can all see it. It’s apparent to everybody at all times. He posted a long Truth Social rant in which he said, “The creeps at the failing New York Times are at it again.” He claimed that he won in 2024 by a landslide, that he settled eight wars, that our economy is great, that he has his highest poll numbers ever. He even called the Times’ Katie Rogers “ugly” on the inside and out. Now, David, on the substance, all of that is bullshit. He won the narrowest victory in recent memory. He hasn’t settled anything close to eight wars. Our economy is in rough shape, and his polling has hit a new low. But there’s a real hit-dog quality to the lying here. Don’t you think, David?

Lurie: Well, on the one hand, it’s his greatest hits. But on the other hand, people are not imagining that Trump is becoming more out of control, that he’s becoming more misogynistic, that he lacks impulse control which causes his natural meanness and bullying tendencies to come out.

Sargent: I want to bring in something Fox News did here because it’s extraordinary. There was a recent Fox poll which had Trump’s approval on the economy at 38 percent to 61 percent disapproval, Trump’s approval on tariffs at 35 to 63, and his approval on healthcare at 34 to 64. Absolutely terrible numbers in the 30s stuck down there. He’s floundering. But then Media Matters documented that Fox personalities, after this poll came out, buried the poll and instead showered him with all the obsequious praise. Portraying him as this world-historical figure—that one of them even described him as a king whose ring people were going to kiss, literally described Trump that way. They were almost apologetic about their own network’s poll showing him really, really weak, so they had to make up for it. I think what that gets at, David, is that Trump’s own propagandists understand how important this aura of strength is to his political mystique.

Lurie: When the character image is punctured in any way, there’s a risk the whole balloon is going to lose its air. It’s the reason that the Fox News personalities recognize they have to engage in these obsequious and absurd, embarrassing demonstrations of praise, because otherwise the image is vulnerable. It’s ever more vulnerable. And when it goes, there’s really nothing left—nothing left at all.

Sargent: Exactly. You had this piece—you came up with the frame of the lame-duck dictator, which is a good way to describe this. Now, it’s common for presidents to present themselves as healthy and strong to the public. We’ve seen that over the decades. We’ve seen it for a long time. But Trump is doing something a little different here, I think. It’s more akin to those pictures of Vladimir Putin shirtless on horseback. This sort of cultishness is a hallmark of authoritarian politics, right? Do you see some of those strains in what Trump’s doing? What’s your sense of that?

Lurie: Well, first of all, I think we’re past the point of having a strain of authoritarianism. It doesn’t mean that we are Putin’s Russia. In fact, it’s because we’re not that we’re seeing the kind of displays that you pointed to. It’s because Trump—and his acolytes and, in the case of Fox News, the businesses that depend on the media-slash-political industry that he is the center of—all depend on Trump appearing to be like Vladimir Putin. Vladimir Putin—his regime depends on him appearing to be something he’s not. Well, Trump, it’s even more the case, right? Here we are in—Trump is, and his people are, trying to append a dictatorship to the United States. And yes, it appeared for some time that they were going to succeed. I mean, Trump has been functioning as a dictator in many respects, but the problem is, of course, that it’s a vulnerable dictatorship. Virtually none of these abuses are popular with the American people. And unlike in Russia, where you can—the dictator can—actually kill a million Russians or send a million Russians into their death at a pointless war, in the United States, presidents, even those who aspire like Trump to be a dictator, do things that are wildly unpopular—their political impact. And it’s coming home to roost for Trump, in my opinion.

Sargent: Well, I want to home in on your point about how this illusion of strength is necessary for masking the weaknesses of this presidency, the structural, deep weaknesses. You see White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt constantly talking about how energetic Trump is. You see his doctor’s reports on his glowing health becoming something almost comical. We’ve all seen these Cabinet meetings where one after another of these figures functions as a North Korea–style propagandist for him, obsequiously bowing down to him, talking about how strong he is, how powerful he is, how—and this is important—what a world-historical figure he is. This is an essential piece of a lot of it. And I think we see with Trump’s reaction to this Times piece that he and they all know how important that illusion of strength is, right? But what his crazy response reveals is that the only way to prop up that illusion is with a lot of lies, and also what’s revealed is that they know how dangerous it is for him to be perceived as weak and diminished. Hence the absurd overreaction.

Lurie: When the image of strength is the linchpin of a leader’s political success, and then all it takes is a puncturing of the image for the success to start to dissipate. And then all of the tools that have been used in the past to promote Trump’s image—some of which you were just referring to, right? The praising of him in the weird Cabinet meetings, they actually end up weakening him. And that, I believe, is the dynamic.

Sargent: I want to close on what I think is a real tension in this situation. It’s between Trump’s political weakness on the one hand, his unpopularity on the one hand, and, on the other hand, his consolidation of authoritarian power. He is a lame duck, as you put it, right? He’s politically weak. He’s unpopular. He’s physically and mentally declining in pretty much every way. And it’s right out there for the country to see the emperor’s clothes have fallen off. And so, given that tension, they have another reason to try to prop up this illusion of strength, mastery, virility, et cetera. It’s so that people don’t resist—they see his triumph over them as inevitable. I thought your piece got at this. In essence, what we’ve got is people not accepting the emperor as he’s being presented to us. And that’s essential, right? It’s essential that they’re not accepting the strong-emperor fiction.

Lurie: It’s now becoming clear that actually having communities organized, through churches and other community organizations, is really, really impairing the invasions on a local level. When they went into North Carolina, particularly through the Catholic Church, communities were immediately organized as soon as they got there. And what had taken a number of weeks to start to organize in Los Angeles, in a shorter period of time to organize in Chicago, took a much—even that much—shorter time to organize in North Carolina, which I believe must have surprised Bovino and Trump. I think they thought they were going into an easy target. At the same time, it’s a much longer conversation, but I think that we’re seeing that his weakness in Washington is developing in a multiplicity of ways. It’s not just the “crack-up of MAGA.” And it’s not just the effectiveness of the ACA strategy that the Democrats implemented. It’s that when the resistance is effectuated and when it’s shown to have a base of popularity, the things that it starts to bring to the fore—that Trump’s not a populist leader—politicians start—including Republicans start—to get worried that if they go along with it, they’re going to pay a price, which is not something they for whatever reason recognized months ago. It was the perceived power of Trump that has been the key to the “success” that he’s realized to this point. And it is the diminishment of that appearance of power that is actually the key to the diminishment of his actual power. I think that’s really what we’re getting at.

Sargent: To sum up, David Lurie, he’s a lame duck dictator and he’s getting a lot lamer, which is going to make him get more dictatorial, but it’s going to fail for him. David Lurie, thank you so much for coming on, man. Great stuff.

Total Pageviews

GOOGLE ANALYTICS

Blog Archive