Friday, November 01, 2024

What Will the End of the Era of Trump Feel Like?

 

 


What Will the End of the Era of Trump Feel Like?

It Could be Just Days or Weeks Away

David Rothkopf

Nov 1

 

 

I can’t think of a time that I did not find Donald Trump repulsive.

I’ve been aware of him for nearly half a century. He was always slimy. Initially, he was just an example of the sleazy underbelly of New York society, the loud, cheesy, strivers who had never read a book, never made a contribution to society. If he didn’t have bad taste, he would have no taste at all.

When he became a “television star” with “The Apprentice,” it was hard for me to fathom. Who could watch him? Who could bear to spend time with him? Who would invite him into their living room every week? His puffed business persona was clearly a lie. His bankruptcies were well known. His vibe was more than a little criminal. You could tell that the one prominent New Yorker he most wanted to be was Mob Boss John Gotti. Same sartorial style. Same sociopathic character.

So, when he announced in 2015 that he was going to run for president, I was one of those who thought of it as a sick joke, an ego spasm that would soon lead to humiliation and for him to crawl back under the rock from which he came (as my Mom would say.)

Somehow, of course, he was vastly more successful as a candidate than I had anticipated. And those running against him in the GOP were vastly more inept. One by one he shunted them aside. With a knack for the media of the day, for generating headlines, for making the dull business of politics into the kind of reality show that was a dominant media form at the time, he actually became the Republican candidate. (It is telling that in the 80s, the GOP won by running a movie star, a man who could play president in a kind of cinematic way and that while Trump was very different from Reagan, they repeated the trick in 2016 by picking the kind of star of the kind of medium that commanded the attention of Americans for whom narratives took too long and were too intellectually demanding. We had become a country demanding constant emotional stimulus in much the same way as a lab monkey will keep hitting the lever in his cage to get as many treats as he can. This was a form of communication that connected more with the emotional center of the brain, the amygdala, with our lizard brain, rather than the cerebral cortex.)

It was also clear however, as Trump ran for president in 2015 and 2016 that he was a profoundly dangerous man. He had no public service experience. The idea that he was a successful businessman was a complete fraud. He had failed in some businesses, like casinos, in which it is impossible to fail. Many of his Trump brands collapsed because they were so clearly fraudulent and tacky. He had no policies to speak of and the instincts of a criminal. And gradually, as he campaigned it became clear he possessed some very dangerous ideas about America’s role in the world, about Russia, about the nature and use of our military, about the role of truth and character in public life, about the economy, about democracy. It was clear from the start that he was a man who would say anything to get what he wanted and embrace anyone who would help him get it. (Though he would very likely discard them when he had no further use for them.)

Thus, at that point, almost a decade ago, I resolved to do whatever I could to oppose his candidacy for the presidency. I was running “Foreign Policy” magazine at the time and we decided to break with tradition to run an editorial stating what a threat he was and endorsing Hillary Clinton. I wrote a series of articles about why I thought he posed a threat and these continued throughout his presidency. Indeed, there was always something to write about…and something to fear…when it came to Trump.

As president, creating chaos, violating norms, breaking laws, damaging the country in countless ways, seeking powers he did not have and later plotting to ignore the will of the American people, it was only natural he dominated the headlines. Somewhat surprisingly, despite two impeachments and indictments and several convictions for a wide variety of crimes (perpetrated by him or his companies), despite a failed coup attempt that marked the first time in our country’s history we did not have a peaceful transfer of presidential power, Trump remained politically relevant even while out of office. Should he have been convicted for the crimes he committed and taken out of circulation? Absolutely yes. But those responsible for our justice system did not have any sense of urgency about convicting him (or for that matter any of the others who were responsible for the planning and top level leadership of the coup attempt). So he remained a viable candidate for reelection.

A person in a vest and vest holding a sign

Description automatically generated

And so it is to this day. For almost an entire decade Donald Trump has dominated US politics as no other figure and throughout that time I have been one of the many who have sought to warn of the threat he posed and to call out his abuses, crimes, errors, ignorance, misjudgment, and general odiousness. I’m not saying I played any special role. There have been thousands upon thousands of us who have similarly been vocal parts of the opposition to Trump backed by millions upon millions who opposed him without taking to a media platform to do so. (Remember, Trump has never won a popular election. The majority of the American people have always opposed him.)

Now, we are five days away from another election. He could, in what would be a calamity for the nation and a grotesque failure of our democracy, win reelection or otherwise engineer it so he was once again awarded the keys to the White House.

Or, alternatively, as I believe will happen, he could lose.

Some think that if he lost, he would remain a candidate and run again, at age 82, in 2028. I do not. He has barely tottered his way through this election. Marble after marble of his already limited supply of marbles have popped out his ear of gone into this handkerchief each time he sneezed. He can barely get around. He can’t keep a campaign schedule. He almost wiped out while trying to get into a garbage truck.

No, if Trump loses, while MAGA may carry on (and some movement like MAGA will be a part of our politics for a long while as the country adapts to inevitable demographic shifts and progress that has some Americans feeling both angry and insecure), his political career will effectively be over. And with nothing in it for him, he will almost surely leave politics behind.

We won’t know that is happening for sure on the evening of November 5. He will lie and fight about the results of the election for as long as he can if Vice President Harris wins. But at some point, it seems likely to me, in the next few days or weeks, the era of Donald Trump will be over in American politics.

This will be a blow not only to Trump but also for the industries that has sprung up around him—notably the media companies that are heavily focused on his every outrage or amplifying his message to his followers—will disappear. There will still be bad people in politics and there will be a battle succeed him in leading the 30 or 40 percent of Americans who followed him through thick and thin, despite his crimes, despite his propensity for hate, despite everything. But if he loses by enough even they may play a diminished role as some group seeks to reestablish a saner Republican Party, realizing what a political loser MAGA has actually been.

But I’ve been wondering what the end of the Trump Era, one of the ugliest in American political history, will feel like. What it will like to wake up and not expect some outrage from him or some new and grave threat associated with his unique combination of endless ambition and zero values. What a world in which we can devote our attention to President Harris’ “to do list” rather than Trump’s “enemies list.”

It will be a big change for many of us. It will mark the end of not just a chapter in the life of the country but in our own careers. It will be kind of a big deal. And I wonder how it will feel.

And, having given it some thought these past few days and weeks and months and well, frankly years, I want to tell you that I expect it to feel…absolutely great.

I can’t wait.

 

HEATHER 10/31/24

 

October 31, 2024

House speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) has responded to news stories about his plan to get rid of the Affordable Care Act (or Obamacare) by claiming his comments at the closed-door campaign event on Monday were taken out of context. But they weren’t. The tape is clear. Johnson said that Republicans want “massive reform” to the Affordable Care Act, also known as “Obamacare.” When an attendee asked, “No Obamacare?” Johnson laughed and agreed: “No Obamacare. The ACA is so deeply ingrained, we need massive reform to make this work, and we got a lot of ideas on how to do that.” 

MAGA Utah senator Mike Lee reposted the video of Johnson and commented: “Kill Obamacare now[.]”

Trump today posted on social media that he never mentioned repealing the Affordable Care Act, “never even thought of such a thing.” But this was either a memory lapse or a lie, because in 2016 he ran on repealing the ACA and his 2016 platform called for “a full repeal of Obamacare.” Within hours of taking office in 2017, Trump issued an executive order weakening the law, and when the Republican-dominated House voted to repeal the law, Trump held a celebration in the Rose Garden and declared the ACA “essentially dead.” 

Senator John McCain (R-AZ) bucked Trump to protect the ACA then, and Trump began this year’s campaign with a promise to get rid of it before backing off. Even still, the vague promise in the 2024 platform to “increase Transparency, promote Choice and Competition, and expand access to new Affordable Healthcare” sounds a lot like Johnson’s promise to restore “the free market” to health care. 

While Democratic nominee Vice President Kamala Harris has been campaigning in the swing states of Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, Trump today held a rally in Albuquerque, New Mexico, a state President Joe Biden won by almost 11 points in 2020 and that Democrats are likely to win in 2024. Trump had to hold the rally at a private airplane hangar after city officials refused to rent the Albuquerque Convention Center to the campaign because it still owes Albuquerque almost $445,000 from a similar rally in 2019.  

Once there, he made it clear he was trying to repair some of the damage caused by the extraordinary racism and sexism on display at his Sunday rally at New York City’s Madison Square Garden, where a comedian called Puerto Rico “a floating island of garbage.” 

Courting offended voters, he said: “Don’t make me waste a whole damn half a day here, OK? Look, I came here. We can be nice to each other, or we can talk turkey. I’m here for one simple reason: I like you very much, and it’s good for my credentials with the Hispanic or Latino community.” That outreach might not be enough to bring back the voters lost after the Madison Square Garden event.

The campaign is seeing other weaknesses, as well. Meredith McGraw and Jessica Piper of Politico reported today that nearly half of the ballots already cast in Pennsylvania have come from voters over the age of 65, and although the numbers of registered older voters are divided evenly between the parties, registered Democrats have made up about 58% of Pennsylvania’s early votes, compared to 35% for Republicans. Those numbers might well simply reflect different approaches to mail-in ballots, but they also might explain why Trump is already claiming fraud in Pennsylvania. 

He is also seemingly nervous about Pennsylvania because women are voting there at a much higher rate than men in the early vote: 56% to 43%. And Democratic women are the biggest group of new voters in the state. New voters who were too young eight years ago to hear the Access Hollywood tape, in which Trump bragged about sexually assaulting women, have been hearing it on TikTok lately, as younger users record their reactions to it and call out their older male relatives for voting for anyone who would talk as Trump did. 

“I moved on her, and I failed,” Trump says in the tape. “I’ll admit it. I did try and f*ck her…. I moved on her like a b*tch, but I couldn’t get there, and she was married,” Trump said. “You know I’m automatically attracted to beautiful— I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab ‘em by the p*ssy. You can do anything,” he said.

The Harris campaign and pro-Harris organizations leaned into the history of women’s suffrage today with videos highlighting those who fought so that women could vote and reiterating: “We are not going back.” To assist those women who might not feel safe letting their husbands know how they voted, women have been posting notes in women’s public bathrooms assuring other women that their vote is secret. A Democratic advertisement voiced by actress Julia Roberts powerfully makes the point that women do not have to tell their husbands how they vote.

Right-wing figures like Charlie Kirk have expressed alarm at the gender gap in voting. As well, there has been a right-wing backlash to the idea that women will vote for Harris while letting their husbands assume they’re voting for Trump.

Former House speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA), who famously cheated on both of his first two wives, expressed dismay at the idea that a woman might need to keep her vote secret from her husband. “For them to tell people to lie is just one further example of the depth of their corruption,” he said. “How do you run a country…saying wives should lie to their husbands, husbands should lie to their wives? I mean, what kind of a totally amoral, corrupt, sick system have the Democrats developed?”

On the Fox News Channel’s The Five this morning, host Jesse Watters said that if he found out his wife “was going into the voting booth and pulling the lever for Harris, that’s the same thing as having an affair…. That violates the sanctity of our marriage.” Christian pastor Dale Partridge posted: “In a Christian marriage, a wife should vote according to her husband’s direction. He is the head and they are one. Unity extends to politics. This is not controversial.” But, he added, “submission does have limits. A wife doesn’t need to submit to her husband in sin (in this case voting democrat).”

Tonight, at an event with right-wing host Tucker Carlson in Glendale, Arizona, Trump seemed to move beyond misogyny to murderous intent. He turned his increasingly violent rhetoric against former representative Liz Cheney (R-WY), who has urged Republican women to vote against Trump. “She’s a radical war hawk,” he said, “Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, OK? Let’s see how she feels about it, you know, when the guns are trained on her face.”  

Carlson is friendly with authoritarian Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orbán, who has undermined democracy in his own country and is close to Russian president Vladimir Putin. Today Orbán posted that he had “Just got off the phone with President [Trump]. I wished him the best of luck for next Tuesday. Only five days to go. Fingers crossed[.]“

Meanwhile, a lot more major endorsements for Harris have been coming in. 

Today basketball legend LeBron James released a powerful one-minute ad with clips of Trump’s many racist statements and drawing a straight line from him back to the most violent days of the civil rights movement. “HATE TAKES US BACK,” it says. In a post sharing the video, James wrote: “When I think about my kids and my family and how they will grow up, the choice is clear to me. VOTE KAMALA HARRIS!!!” James has 53 million followers on X. 

The Economist today endorsed Harris, warning that “a second Trump term comes with unacceptable risks.” Former New York City mayor Mike Bloomberg also posted on social media that he had voted for Harris “without hesitation,” and added that he hoped undecided voters would join him. “Trump is not fit for high office,” he wrote in a Bloomberg op-ed. He praised Harris’s positive vision and bipartisan outreach. 

Conservative judge J. Michael Luttig published an op-ed in the New York Times on Tuesday, titled: “My Fellow Republicans, It’s Time to Say ‘Enough’ With Trump.” The former president is unfit for office, Luttig wrote. “When we entrusted our Constitution and our democracy to him before, he betrayed us.” Luttig assured readers that “[t]here  could be no higher duty of American citizenship than to decisively repudiate” Trump.

He reminded his fellow Republicans that they had always “proudly claimed they would be the first to put the country above all else when the time came. That time has come…. ​​All Americans, but especially Republicans, will live with their decision the rest of their lives.” “The choice for America next Tuesday,” Luttig wrote, “could not be clearer.”

Ever since Vice President Harris tapped Minnesota governor Tim Walz as her running mate, Democratic governors have been demonstrating their support for one of their own. Today, for Halloween, Democratic  governors Wes Moore of Maryland, Janet Mills of Maine, Maura Healey of Massachusetts, Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan, and Phil Murphy of New Jersey each dressed to match a photograph of Walz.

“No tricks this Halloween!” Whitmer posted. “Just dressing up as our friend [Tim Walz]—excited to elect him and [Kamala Harris]. If you haven’t yet, make a plan to vote: http://iwillvote.com[.]”

Total Pageviews

GOOGLE ANALYTICS

Blog Archive