Tuesday, July 28, 2026

NEW INC. MAGAZINE COLUMN FROM HOWARD TULLMAN

 

Rich, Busy, and Clueless: The New Clients Fueling a $250,000 Matchmaking Boom

Technology has made the matching process ever easier, which has had a mixed impact.

 

EXPERT OPINION BY HOWARD TULLMAN, GENERAL MANAGING PARTNER, G2T3V AND CHICAGO HIGH TECH INVESTORS @TULLMAN

Jul 28, 2026

 

 

In the decades before the scourge of the pandemic, admitting that you met your mate through a marriage broker or an online dating service was generally regarded as a confession of behavior somewhere between despair and desperation. It wasn’t as bad as buying a mail order bride or marrying a pen pal who was in prison for life, but it could still raise eyebrows. Blind dates, hooking up and one-night stands were all deemed to be acceptable youthful behavior and not expected to lead anywhere anyway. But marrying someone you met on Match.com just wasn’t something you bragged about to your friends and neighbors. It smacked of having no other choices and settling for someone equally at wit’s end.

However, Covid-19 gave millions of cellar dwellers and wallflowers permission and the opportunity to actively seek out companionship and even more substantial commitments in online forums and dating services where they wouldn’t have otherwise been caught dead. And to be clear, it was no longer confined to any particular age group or gender. It wasn’t as pristine as Tom Hank’s and Meg Ryan’s romance in You’ve Got Mail, but at least it was no longer perceived as pathetic. But the whole matching process—finding your future on your phone—was never really accepted and always regarded as déclassé.

Technology has made the matching process ever easier and easier which has had a mixed impact. Initial connections were much simpler to secure because there were millions of people in the database, but at the opposite end of the martial spectrum, equal millions of would-be romances and suggested introductions were immediately thwarted by tech-enhanced critical scrutiny and rejections resulting from a quick scan of a prospect’s online persona. There’s a persistent FOMO-like sense among online searchers that a better bet and a more attractive match are just a swipe or two away. So, they keep searching and coming up empty. After all is said and done, the bottom line has never really changed. Many people still think looking for love online is for losers. This persistent attitude and a consistent lack of results have led to user fatigue, disappointment, and large-scale abandonment of the online services. And it’s created a resurgent demand for face-to-face personal matchmaking services.

As a result, and notwithstanding all of the subtle and not so subtle opprobrium, the U.S. matchmaking industry has rapidly expanded to meet that demand. It now numbers over 2,000 “professional” firms of various sizes and of widely different skill sets, experience levels, and even pricing models. This number is, of course, substantially supplemented by “helpful” parents, friends and other family, know-it-all neighbors and yentas, and plenty of intrusive experts at the office.

But the real explosive growth in the business—more than two-thirds of the newer firms—has come from corporate chains expanding nationwide, much like the model of H&R Block. These numerous and readily accessible players occupy (and have actually already overcrowded) the lower segments of the marketplace. Their stated efforts to use technology and now AI to professionalize and standardize a very sloppy, unregulated, and chaotic industry have mainly resulted in dramatic price increases for their basic standardized and turnkey services. These price hikes combined with a Wild West environment without rules or regulations regarding any player’s behavior, promises, representations or performance guarantees have brought the expected onslaught of crooks, con men and scam artists – all enabled by A.I. and the awareness that no civilian, client or customer can ever tell what’s really inside of their black box. High demand, high prices, an ignorant and gullible customer base, and no applicable laws make for an environment ideally suited to cheats and criminals.

But technology has also been inadvertently responsible for the expansion of a singular high-end segment of the match-making business which has thrived in the new environment—especially on both coasts and in D.C.—by offering previously unimaginably high prices for their personalized and customized services. Their specific targets—rarely overtly stated—are tech-created rich nerds looking for love with huge gobs of cash, no time, no class, and no clue as to how to proceed to find a partner.

And there are lots of new mini-millionaires like these being created every day by AI IPOs and the expiration of all manner of lockups and other trading restrictions, especially around crypto deals. They literally have more money than they (or their parents) have ever had in their lives and almost no ability to evaluate which of these firms might make sense for them to employ in their quest.

So, in the time-honored tradition of the very best tech promoters and marketers, these poor suckers fall back on the stupidest rationale of all: How can it be bad if it costs so much? Worse yet, there’s clearly a Veblen effect as well which dictates that higher prices for luxury or scarce goods increase the demand rather than reduce it. And finally, there’s clearly a FOMO effect which the high-end and high-priced personal matchmakers make very clear and that is that their time and resources are limited, the number of great men or women out there who are looking is a finite number, and waiting will never get you anything worth waiting for.

The bottom line: the highest-end boutique players in this very narrow field are perfectly comfortable charging rates between $50,000 and $250,000 for their services with no strings and no guarantees attached. They serve executives, high-net-worth individuals, and successful entrepreneurs. And they’re getting these kinds of numbers and growing their revenue every year. It’s all legal for now, but I guess the real question—like so many Trumpian actions these days—is should it be legal?

Total Pageviews

GOOGLE ANALYTICS

Blog Archive