Showing posts with label MARK CUBAN. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MARK CUBAN. Show all posts

Thursday, July 31, 2025

SWEATY EQUITY LAUNCH


 

Today's gratitude goes to this guy, Howard Tullman. AKA "The Wizard" of Chicago Tech.

Howard generously took us under his wing as a team of 23-year-old founders trying to find our way. He got in the trenches with us (you'll see him in action alongside Mark Cuban if you read the chapter called "Cage Match of the Giants") and never pulled any punches.

It's no secret that Howard Tullman is tough, and you'll see that come through in the stories of the book. As such, being around Tullman toughened me up in a variety of necessary ways, showed me an example of a champion at the intersection of Art & Business, and he was instrumental in helping us crack into the arena of entrepreneurship back at 1871.

As an early reader of Sweaty Equity: A Ball Boy, A Billionaire, and the Bonkers Startup Tale You've Never Heard, Howard dove in cover to cover and gave me some of the most detailed, thoughtful notes I'd received in the process of writing.

Now, it's an honor to receive The Wizard's testimonial as a reader. Thanks for this, and for everything, Howard!

-----
From HAT:

“There’s no shortage of startup stories out there, but very few add actual value in return for the investment of your time. Mike Shannon’s Sweaty Equity, a personal recollection of a rough, but ultimately rewarding journey, doesn’t try to glorify the gauntlet, gild the lily, or please all the participants — it digs into the actual mess, the missed turns, the crucial pivots, and the moments that mattered most to him and to his team. This is a straightforward study of how you assemble a team, hold it together during the toughest of times, and come to understand that you only really become a team when you learn to trust and rely on each other. And it reminds us all that you never know who's going to bring you your future."




Tuesday, June 24, 2025

NEW INC. MAGAZINE COLUMN FROM HOWARD TULLMAN

 

Lead

6 Tips to Inspire and Motivate Your Team

Here’s how to turbocharge your business, build momentum, and take it to the next level.

 

EXPERT OPINION BY HOWARD TULLMAN, GENERAL MANAGING PARTNER, G2T3V AND CHICAGO HIGH TECH INVESTORS @HOWARDTULLMAN1

Jun 24, 2025

In most of the successful turnarounds I’ve led over the years, one of my first steps was to distribute to the entire company a “manifesto” that outlined the fundamental ideas and strategies around change management that I had developed and adopted over several decades. Typically, it was 8-10 pages long and had around 20 sections addressing various issues and concerns. When you step into a new leadership position, it’s absolutely critical that you communicate – consistently and constantly – your approach, objectives, and philosophy to the entire team.

While the comments and concepts contained in my manifesto weren’t written in stone, I was always amazed at how little change needed to be made in the basic document regardless of the business or the industry I was dealing with at the time and regardless of how much time had passed since that document was first written. I’ve also had an opportunity over the last 12 years of writing my weekly Inc. column to expand on and explore almost every one of these bullet points in more detail.

But I believe that you never stop learning, especially if you pay attention; that you never know who’s going to teach you something new and important; and that iteration with an eye toward constant improvement (successive approximation rather than postponed perfection) is the ultimate key to success in any endeavor. Getting a little better every day is the goal. As Mark Cuban likes to say: Perfectionism is the enemy of profitability.

I like to revisit one of my earliest columns, “What I Learned from My Waitress,” once or twice a year to help keep me honest. And I continue to recommend it to new business builders and experienced entrepreneurs as well on a regular basis. Getting a few important things right is the name of the game. Trying to do too many things and spreading yourself a mile wide and an inch deep is a formula for failure.

So, I was interested and intrigued when Anton Marchanka, the new CEO for Zing Coach, an AI-powered fitness app that’s been around since 2021 with about 200,000 paid subscribers, reached out to me to explain how he’s planning to turbocharge his business, build new momentum, and take it to the next level.

He says that great startups don’t run like big businesses. They operate like swift pirate ships – fast, fluid and flexible. And he offered his six most important tips for talking to the team. Here’s what I took away from his list.

Start with a story

Forget the spreadsheets, strategies and lengthy pitch decks. Tell a simple story that the whole team can understand, buy into, and get aggressively behind. Fill the boat with believers. Or, as he says, “turn strangers into shipmates.”

Startups are leaky

Make sure you’re honest about the risks of the venture and the odds of success in fairness to the people you’re asking to come aboard. There are no guarantees other than that you and everyone else will be working their asses off to try to get it done or die trying. You want people who commit to the journey and not simply to some imagined and hoped-for destination.

Your story should sound somewhat scary

You can’t steal second base with one foot on first. It’s a big challenge – a big ask – and a leap of faith to join a team that’s trying to disrupt the current ways of doing things and invent the future. Not for the faint of heart. Big risks are the only things that generate big rewards.

Your story should be convincing, but not complete

No one has a crystal ball or can predict the future, but the best entrepreneurs know that the main job is to steer a steady course forward through rough seas, unforeseen obstacles, and constant changes in the circumstances, the marketplace and the competition. No battle plan ever survives the first contact with the opposition. If you find a path with no obstacles, it probably doesn’t lead anywhere.

You’ve got to sell your story to the team

Leaders are great salesmen and storytellers and the first thing they’ve got to sell is themselves. Let them know that you’ve been through this before and you know how it ends. Every emotion in a startup is contagious – confidence, commitment and also concern. You’ve got to convince the team that you’ve got what it takes to get the job done. Keep your own head up at all times. Perpetual optimism is a force multiplier.

The journey’s as important as the end result

Anyone who knows how hard, painful and uncertain it is to try to build a new business knows that no one with any experience does it just for the promised pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. It’s the shared experience, the endless blood, sweat and tears, and the lifelong bonds and attachments you form along the way with your peers that make the journey so important and worthwhile regardless of the outcome. As you progress and face the uncertainty and the challenges together, you realize that you need each other. It’s good to have an end to journey toward; but it is the journey that matters, in the end.

The bottom line is, there’s no magic set of words or phrases – no single solution for all circumstances – but one thing’s absolutely certain: If you don’t make the effort to tell your story to your people, your investors, and your customers, your ship will be sunk shortly after you’ve set sail.

Tuesday, June 10, 2025

NEW INC. MAGAZINE COLUMN FROM HOWARD TULLMAN

 

Why Small Businesses Should Celebrate Genericide

Patent and trademark enforcement has become an important economic tool for entrepreneurs.

EXPERT OPINION BY HOWARD TULLMAN, GENERAL MANAGING PARTNER, G2T3V AND CHICAGO HIGH TECH INVESTORS @HOWARDTULLMAN1

Jun 10, 2025

 

Nabisco’s Nilla Wafers have been a reliable staple in cookie jars since 1898, but the brand name is only 58 years old. In 1967, Nabisco rebranded the product from Vanilla Wafers to Nilla Wafers. Unlike “Nilla,” a protectable name that could be trademarked, “Vanilla Wafers” had become a victim of genericide—when a brand name loses its identity thanks to consumers using it to refer to all products in its category. Like Zipper, Aspirin, Cellophane, and Escalator—whose owners had failed to preserve their legal and proprietary status—the sweet treats had become so common and popular that the name came to be regarded as generic.

Today, Genericide is one of the only “-cides” that small businesses should cheer for. Patent and trademark enforcement has become an important economic tool for all manner of merchants. Last month, Mondelez International, which now owns and manufactures Wheat Thins, filed a federal lawsuit in Chicago to stop the multinational supermarket chain Aldi from selling store-brand products that blatantly copy and infringe on its trademarks. The crafty and innovative marketers at Aldi have been selling crackers called Thin Wheat, which Mondelez argues could be confused with Wheat Thins.

The classic examples of aggressive and successful litigants are Kleenex and Xerox (still protected) and, more recently, Google. It will be interesting to see what happens with ChatGPT and Ozempic. With millions of dollars in sales and huge investments made by large companies in building brand equity, you can be sure that the rip-offs, the hairsplitting, and the lawsuits are coming.

When patent and trademark enforcement is abused, as it has been for decades in the drug business, with the continued blessing of bribed Congressmen, it ends up costing consumers millions of dollars in inflated pharmaceutical prices. It also prevents important and widely used drugs that have been around for decades from becoming generic and subject to lower-cost production, duplication, and distribution of generic versions by other manufacturers.

Trademark or patent expiration is the worst nightmare of biopharmaceutical companies like AbbVie, AstraZeneca and Bristol-Myers. Low-cost competition is a close second. Mark Cuban’s Cost Plus Drugs might well be in third place. And to be very clear, this isn’t something trivial. There are thousands of lives hanging in the balance, even as MAGA enabler and Iowa Senator Joni Ernst snidely notes that “we all are going to die” eventually. High prices make it harder for millions of consumers who need the drugs to access and afford to pay for them.

One of the main ploys of the pharma frauds is to artificially extend expiring patents and trademarks (which would open the market to generics) to continue to suppress and exclude competition and keep prices as high as possible. This approach, often called “evergreening,” consists of reformulating the same drug into extended-release versions, creating new delivery methods, changing dosages, and seeking broader and additional uses for the drugs. All of these strategies are accompanied by massive ad campaigns and direct attacks on the efficacy of substitutes and any generic alternatives.

AbbVie, for example, was able to secure and maintain exclusivity in the U.S. market for Humira for over 20 years after initial approval. AstraZeneca built Nexium into a $5 billion annual product line by rebranding an older drug, claiming it was a new and improved version, and limiting distribution. Bristol-Myers litigated for years with various generics and conducted repeated lengthy trials to prop up and build Abilify into a $9 billion product line.

There’s some modest good news on the horizon, although much of it will need to await the departure of the Orange Monster and his flunkies, who are comfortably in the pocket of Big Pharma.

Increasingly, and especially after the pandemic, which effectively democratized and dissipated much of the mystery of medicine, millions of consumers are wising up and moving from the expensive brands to store brands, OTC products, and generics. Much more needs to be done to break through the ongoing consolidation of drug manufacturers; to break down the price-gouging medical oligopolies; and to reform, improve, and actively enforce all of the available legal and administrative regulations and limitations.

We can live with bands like the Eagles and Led Zeppelin extending their shelf lives and livelihoods by replacing dead band members with their somewhat talented sons, but our medicine is life-changing and lifesaving. We shouldn’t tolerate or accept parasitical pharmaceutical companies that delay and defer the availability of critically important drugs for years to maximize their profits.

 

Tuesday, August 22, 2023

NEW INC. MAGAZINE COLUMN FROM HOWARD TULLMAN

 

You Need to Reimagine How You Market Your Brand

Some of the big names in consumer products are losing share because they can no longer demonstrate that they deserve a price premium. Make sure you're doing the right things to communicate your product's value.

 

BY HOWARD TULLMAN, GENERAL MANAGING PARTNER, G2T3V AND CHICAGO HIGH TECH INVESTORS@HOWARDTULLMAN1

 

Brands just aren't bringing it and getting the job done any longer. They used to represent a shorthand promise based on the simple premise that you could have basic confidence that you were getting more value for your spend even if you paid a premium for the privilege. That could be in the form of quality, durability, safety, ingredients or efficacy -- but we all believed for decades that something made a brand worth the additional investment. Brands were also an efficient way to address decision fatigue given the virtually unlimited shopping and product choices on the web today.

But now it seems that only those people (entertainers, influencers, gangbangers) who are utterly indifferent to price are still spending and sporting the top few big-name brands for reasons having much more to do with reputation, endorsement payouts and bragging rights than with any connection to reality. The world's wearing Apple watches these days while the jocks and party people are still sporting their diamond-encrusted Rolexes. We're never going to entirely eliminate the ancillary messaging and emotional considerations that accompany upscale brands that have little or nothing to do with function or features, but the days of blindly buying a premium brand for practical, prudent, and economic reasons are long gone for most products.

When you read investigative articles that suggest the private label brands at Costco or Walmart are being manufactured on the sly by the same makers of the branded goods, it's more than unsettling - it's a wake-up call. People aren't panting any more to pay up for products that are functionally indistinguishable from the private labels and even generics, which are being increasingly pushed by the large retail chains. We're seeing this all over the place, but especially with respect to the multi-billion-dollar marketplace for over-the-counter medications. 

Millions of consumers don't believe in much of anything these days, and the MAGAts only believe Trump, largely due to his eight-year assault on the truth. Brand names are just one important casualty. The Trumpist war on truth and medicine throughout the pandemic--which cost them tens of thousands of dead Red voters -- has really diminished consumer confidence in doctors and drugs in general. Drugs aren't the whole story, but they're a great early indicator of consumer brand behavior. As more and more products become confusingly similar and make identical claims regarding effectiveness, price rather than brand drives the decision bus.

There are several explanations for these new customer attitudes toward OTC medications that will eventually impact the future viability of every major brand. The players who react and adapt to the new environment and change their brand messaging, product offerings and customer interactions will survive and grow; those who choose to rest on their laurels and past performance will ride their brands right into the ground. Kraft Heinz's lousy results, even with higher prices, meant a newly-announced CEO. There's still time now - although Big Pharma doesn't seem to get the picture - and soon there will be plenty of blame for the losers and also-rans to spread around.

You could put part of the blame on the pharma companies themselves for clear and repeated price gouging, which the side-by-side comparative displays at Walgreens or CVS make abundantly clear to even the most obtuse observer. Wanna spend three bucks more for a bottle of Bayer aspirin or a tube of Neosporin for absolutely no good reason? Be my guest.

Of course, now that Walgreens has decided in its newest urban stores to hide virtually everything in closed cages or back-of-house, and to use kiosks and clerks to fill orders, maybe these awkward comparisons, which actually helped to educate the consumer, will disappear. That would be unfortunate but at least it won't kill the instant, internet-enabled, comparison pricing for virtually anything that's going on in every store. This smartphone-based smart shopping certainly hasn't made life any easier for the big brands.

Whatever your budget constraints may be, no one wants to look foolish or feel that they're being gouged. Mark Cuban's amazing new initiative - Cost Plus Drugs continues to gain traction and Amazon is jumping aggressively into the pharmacy business as well, which will clearly help drive drug prices down. It's no accident that Blue Shield California has announced plans to work with Amazon, Cuban and CVS on a new distribution system. President Biden's action in locking down the price of insulin for millions of patients is another amazing step forward.

You could say that the panache of pharma brands has been hard to polish and promote when there's so much noise in traditional broadcast channels, where every other ad is for some disease like TED, RVS or AMD that no one's ever heard of. These voluminous ads are clearly targeted to the few ancient and infirm people still watching the tube.  Ever since the success of the "purple pill" promotion, you no longer see the long-recognizable corporate names in their TV ads. The message is all about some made-up catchy name extracted by an overpaid ad agency from the drug's technical designation. Doctors now constantly complain that their patients no longer want diagnoses, they just want the pill with the cute name or the one that makes the fat go away.

And while cable subscriptions are largely a function of consumer inertia, the streamers are spending millions to try to move subscribers upstream to more expensive, ad-free tiers. They're telling the whole world that ads are worthless interruptions and an utter waste of time. In many ways, the bipolar ad industry is eating its own lunch and making its future prospects even more uncertain.

The clear implication in all this anti-ad messaging is that only morons and the poor have to suffer through dozens of ads every day in order to watch reruns, repetitive ad flights, and pitches for old people. Someone recently said that - given the average age of its audience - CBS now stands for "Could Be Sleeping."  And that it's really no harm, no foul if you should happen to nod off because in the online, all the time, connected world there's really nothing new about the nightly news. 

The message being sent to new generations of prospective viewers (and, obviously, consumers) is that all of the ads on traditional broadcast channels, cable stations, and even on much of the new and inexpensive offerings by the streamers are worthless wastes of their time and attention. As we enter the 2024 election ad cycle and suffer through the noise and clutter and the indiscriminate spray-and-pray ugliness, the situation will only worsen for the next 14 months, along with the ability of even the biggest brands to break through.

The bottom line for every business is that - while building and sustaining your brand will be important and challenging - it's even more critical to give your customers (past, present, and prospective) concrete reasons to continue to purchase, use and support your products and services.

Two key things to keep in mind:

(1)    Your team members will be essential to this process because people increasingly will be more likely to trust your employees, their interactions with them, and their suggestions and recommendations than anything else. Successful sales will always be a people business.  

(2)    Businesses and their brands in the future are going to have to have and successfully communicate to the world a purpose beyond profit in order to connect to tomorrow's consumers.

Tuesday, May 03, 2016

The Mark Cuban Effect: How a Vocal Billionaire Is Betting on Higher Ed’s Disruption


The Mark Cuban Effect: How a Vocal Billionaire Is Betting on Higher Ed’s Disruption

MAY 03, 2016


Frederic J. Brown/AFP/Getty Images
Mark Cuban, the celebrity businessman, has some definite views about the state of higher education: "When I see something that is wrong and fixable, I have no problem speaking up about it."
Mark Cuban is known for mouthing off. Typically it’s from courtside at a Dallas Mavericks basketball game (he owns the NBA team), from a leather armchair on the set of the hit ABC show Shark Tank(he’s a regular), or from the op-ed pages of the business press (where he often rails against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission).
His natural milieu isn’t a wonky Twitter debate about education policy. But on a recent Saturday night, when you’d think one of the country’s best-known billionaires might have more entertaining ways to spend his time, Mr. Cuban spent an hour on social media spouting his education views while sparring with Sara Goldrick-Rab, a sociology professor who advocates for free community college.
Mr. Cuban’s comments included a critique of accreditation, a call to eliminate the tax-deductibility of donations for college buildings, pleas for greater use of open-source textbooks as a way to save students "real money," and some tough love for students who hadn’t learned to make good financial choices.
At one point, he even tangled with Ms. Goldrick-Rab over her research findings on the growing number of students struggling with food and housing insecurity. "Every kid that eats ramen noodles has food insecurity," Mr. Cuban retorted.
 "You could’ve knocked me over," Ms. Goldrick-Rab said later, of the exchange. The two had met two years earlier, when they were both on a conference panel in Arizona. They disagreed about a lot back then, too, but at heart, she’s a fan. Ms. Goldrick-Rab, who will soon take a post at Temple University, appreciates that a business personality like Mr. Cuban is "intellectually engaged" on those issues. "I would like to see more people like him feeling free to ask more questions and just jump in," she says.
Of course, Mr. Cuban does have a stake in the future of education. He’s an investor in at least four start-up companies focused on higher education. And he’s been a vocal critic of what he calls the "ridiculous" spending by colleges on administrative salaries and glitzy campus facilities, and the "easy money" of student loans. The education business, he says, "is a mess."
Being an ed-tech investor doesn’t make someone an expert on college. And that’s certainly not a label Mr. Cuban, 57, has tried to claim for himself.
“I would like to see more people like him feeling free to ask more questions and just jump in.”
But the business titan and onetime Dancing With the Stars contestant has become a valued mentor to a select group of education entrepreneurs and at least one college leader. For better or worse, he is also a visible and often-provocative voice for shaking up the higher-education status quo, a stature that may have as much to do with the tone of the times as with the merits of Mr. Cuban’s ideas. These days it seems just about anyone with a fat wallet feels entitled to play higher-education critic.
Mr. Cuban shared his views on education in a series of email exchanges with The Chronicle last month. His comments in this article are also drawn from an interview with this reporter two years ago, as well as his public remarks from the panel with Ms. Goldrick-Rab and other sources.
"When I see something that is wrong and fixable," says Mr. Cuban, "I have no problem speaking up about it."

A Search for ‘Pain Points’

It’s in his role as an investor that Mr. Cuban is most hands-on with education issues.
His investment philosophy is simple. He says he looks for "pain points" in industries — students’ aversion to high-priced textbooks, for example, or the anxieties about the value of a traditional college degree — and puts his money into companies that are trying to fix them.
He has stakes in four young companies: Copley Systems, which tracks students’ academic activities with a data system that helps colleges keep them on track to graduate; Degreed, which provides a digital platform for people to showcase a variety of educational credentials; Packback, which began by selling short-term rentals of digital textbooks but is now shifting to offer online communities for students and professors who use the same books; and Ranku, which helps colleges create more-effective systems for finding and enrolling online students.

Mark Cuban on What Ails Higher Education

Mark Cuban has strong ideas on what’s wrong with higher education. Among the key issues, as he sees it, are:
• Student debt: Mr. Cuban owns the websitecollegedebt.com, which maintains a running total of cumulative student debt. The tally now surpasses $1.4 trillion, nearly twice as much as car loans, according to the site, and he says the student-debt burden is a serious problem for the entire country. He argues that students who take on too much debt are part of the problem, too. Eventually employers will look down on such students, he predicts: "It’s going to be the equivalent of putting a drunk picture on Facebook."
• Wasteful spending: He argues that the availability of student-loan money fuels wasteful spending by colleges. "Easy money has led to colleges’ spending money on ridiculous ‘drive-up appeal’ features for their universities, which in turn increase tuition prices," he says. All of those stadiums, food courts, and fitness centers, he says, are just assets that depreciate in value and require continuous spending for upkeep. "They become boat anchors," he adds.
• Academic labor: He has criticized colleges’ overreliance on adjunct instructors, likening the practice of paying instructors low wages while charging students full price as "arbitrage."
Mr. Cuban was one of the first outside investors in Copley. Keith Clougherty, a software developer and a founder of the company, has known Mr. Cuban since the mid-1990s, when they would run into each other at e-commerce trade shows and occasionally catch up using AOL Chat. In 2013, 18 months after starting his company, Mr. Clougherty wrote to Mr. Cuban, seeking a small investment. "Within two minutes he pinged me back," says Mr. Clougherty. He declines to specify the size of the investment but says it was less than $1 million.
Especially in the early days, having Mr. Cuban as an investor was a big plus. With thousands of ed-tech companies out there, "his brand and his dollars helped us break through," says Mr. Clougherty. Mr. Cuban’s willingness to lend his celebrity to the companies he backs, as with his participation at that panel in Arizona, during the 2014 ASU GSV Summit, certainly helped too.
Today Copley says its software is in use on 50 campuses and involves about 250,000 students.
If there’s any downside to having a brash businessman like Mr. Cuban as an investor when selling to the higher-education market, the founders of his four companies in the market say they haven’t encountered it. "It either goes unnoticed" or it’s a plus, says Michael Shannon, who landed a $250,000 investment from Mr. Cuban after he and his Packback co-founders appeared on Shark Tank in 2014 to pitch their company. Mr. Cuban is one of the show’s original "sharks" — the investors who grill entrepreneurs about their pitches and decide on the spot how much they’ll invest for a share of the company. Whenever Mr. Shannon speaks to professors and others on campuses, he finds "it’s incredible how popular the show is."
Kim Taylor, a founder of Seattle-based Ranku, says Mr. Cuban’s involvement made it easier to attract additional venture-capital investors. "There’s a thing about Mark that others like to follow," she says. But his popularity goes beyond the VC crowd. "My grandmother knows who he is."
Mr. Cuban is more than a figurehead for those education ventures. He typically demands weekly updates, and, while he doesn’t take seats on boards of directors, he communicates frequently with the founders via text message and Cyber Dust, an app whose messages disappear. (He created Cyber Dust after the SEC used his private text messages in a failed insider-trading case against him.)
"He’s our most-involved investor," says Ms. Taylor, who became acquainted with Mr. Cuban through friends whose companies he had invested in. When she began her company, he heard about it somehow — "he reads everything," she says — and connected with her via Facebook. He was the first one in on the company’s initial $1-million round of investment after talking with her casually one afternoon in New York City. "There wasn’t a slide deck," she says of her nontraditional pitch to him. "We were in a bar."

The ‘Megaphone’ of Celebrity

David Blake, chief executive of Degreed, says he sought an investment from Mr. Cuban after admiring the mogul’s posts on Blog Maverick. He emailed him out of the blue, and after a few exchanges of emails and a few weeks, Mr. Cuban became one of nine investors in a $1.8-million seed round. The company, which goes by the slogan "the future doesn’t care how you became an expert," has since raised an additional $28 million.
Mr. Cuban has opened doors for the company as it has begun seeking corporate partnerships, going so far at one point to write personally to a chief executive and chief technology officer at a Fortune 20 company he knew to tell them, "here’s why I invested, and here’s what I love about them," says Mr. Blake. "There was quickly a fire lit there," he says, and Degreed got a meeting. The company reports it now has about 100 corporate clients, 115 employees, and more than one million users.
Mr. Cuban does more than make introductions. He has advised Mr. Clougherty to be bolder and to "stick your chest out a little more," the Copley co-founder says. And when Ms. Taylor confided to him once about a "gentleman client" who was being "unreasonable and rude," she says the advice he gave her about the importance of keeping a client happy helped her work toward a resolution. (He also reminded her that "karma’s a bitch," so she shouldn’t let an annoying client get under her skin.)
Despite all of his far-flung interests — Mr. Cuban’s website shows his investments in some 100 companies, including substantially larger ventures like the Landmark Theatres chain — colleagues of his note that he manages to be generous with his time in dealing with young entrepreneurs.
"The good thing about him is he’s more patient than you would ever imagine," especially if you know about Mr. Cuban only from watching him during a Mavericks game, says Howard A. Tullman, who runs a start-up incubator in Chicago called 1871 and says he has known Mr. Cuban since "before he was rich." (That would be prior to 1999, when Mr. Cuban sold his company Broadcast.com to Yahoo for $5.7 billion.) Both men are investors in Packback.
While Mr. Cuban may not be steeped in the nuances of higher-education policy, says Mr. Tullman, it’s not like "having a Kardashian endorse an education company." That Mr. Cuban is willing to use the "megaphone" of his celebrity doesn’t trouble him in the least. "If he said consistently no one should ever go to college again," says Mr. Tullman, "that would be a problem."
When people have 'particular interests in particular outcomes based on their investment portfolio, we have to be wary.'
But the outsize megaphone that a billionaire can command can sometimes be dangerous, warns Audrey Watters, a writer who follows the education-technology scene. People like Mr. Cuban or Peter Thiel, another billionaire who’s famous for deriding colleges, are sometimes "given credence when they don’t really have a clue." Ms. Watters says their critique of colleges exemplifies a current "Silicon Valley narrative that education institutions stand in the way of the future."
She understands the appeal of their argument. "Clearly higher ed is facing a lot of challenges," notes Ms. Watters. But when people have "particular interests in particular outcomes based on their investment portfolio, we have to be wary," she argues. For them, "the fix is going to be a product" rather than, say, more public funding for colleges. "They aren’t necessarily white knights."

‘The Ultimate Accreditor’

Mr. Cuban, for his part, says it’s important to call out the higher-education system for its faults, which include college-marketing efforts that "reflect the same tactics that companies desperate to stay alive undertake," or accreditation, which he calls "too much of a cartel." It’s the employer who hired the graduate or the customer who buys the music student’s music that reflects the quality of education, he says. "That’s the ultimate accreditor."
Unlike some other entrepreneurs, Mr. Cuban hasn’t made noises about starting his own college. But he has some strong feelings about what such an institution might look like: For starters, he says, it would have a "fraction of the administration" of most institutions, few specialized buildings, a wide range of courses, including the liberal arts, and a variable tuition model, where the price of a course would be based on the size of the class, how much it was in demand, and the expertise of the instructor.
Such variable-priced courses "would allow students to inexpensively experiment with different classes until they determined what they wanted their major to be — or to take classes purely out of interest." He says any college he built would not include NCAA athletics.
Those ideas may seem simplistic to many traditional-college leaders, but the lower-the-price ideology that underpins them does resonate with some in academe. That includes Michael J. Sorrell, president of Paul Quinn College, a historically black institution in Mr. Cuban’s home city of Dallas where 84 percent of the students are needy enough to qualify for Pell Grants. Mr. Sorrell and Mr. Cuban befriended each other about two years ago, around the time Paul Quinn was developing a new work-college approach to lower its tuition.
Their conversations "about how you think about delivering education" helped to form its revised strategy, says Mr. Sorrell. And when Paul Quinn announced its new New Urban College Model, in early 2015, the news release noted that Mr. Cuban would be developing an open-source course on entrepreneurship for the college that would be made available to other institutions.
"I don’t even have a word for it," says Mr. Sorrell, of Paul Quinn’s relationship with Mr. Cuban.
As for Mr. Cuban’s relationship with his own alma mater, those ties are hard to characterize, too. He and Indiana University at Bloomington’s president, Michael A. McRobbie, haven’t had any deep heart-to-hearts about the state of higher education, a university spokesman says. But Mr. Cuban did agree to appear in a cheeky commercial for the university that features an actor who’s a look-alike for a young Mark Cuban.
He has also donated to the institution, but not in any extravagant way. His most recent gift was for $5 million, in June 2015, for a new video and broadcasting center that will include technology for making broadcasts in 3-D and virtual reality.
And even with his philanthropy, he remains true to his critique. He says his money comes with a stipulation: It can’t be used for buildings.
Goldie Blumenstyk writes about the intersection of business and higher education. Check out www.goldieblumenstyk.com for information on her new book about the higher-education crisis; follow her on Twitter @GoldieStandard; or email her atgoldie@chronicle.com.

Total Pageviews

GOOGLE ANALYTICS

Blog Archive