MAXWELL PER WILES

 

A TRUE PATRIOT AND A FILTHY PIG

 

THE CONDOM LEAKED

 

SUSIE WILES SPILLS THE BEANS TO TRY TO SAVE HER REP AND HER BUTT

 BREAKING: Vanity Fair author Chris Whipple just revealed stunning details from his conversations with Susie Wiles, Trump’s chief of staff. 

Here’s what she told him: - Wiles said she has read the Epstein documents and acknowledged that Trump’s name is in them. - Wiles said she urged Trump NOT to pardon the most violent January 6 rioters. He ignored her advice. - She admitted Trump is looking for retribution...“when there’s an opportunity, he will go for it.” - She tried to convince Trump to stop “score-settling” against political enemies after 90 days in office. That effort failed because Trump’s desire for retribution never stopped. - Wiles directly contradicted Trump’s claims about Bill Clinton, stating there is “no evidence” Clinton ever visited Jeffrey Epstein’s private island. - She described Trump as having “an alcoholic’s personality.” Wiles said her ability to work with him comes from growing up with an alcoholic father, the sportscaster Pat Summerall. - On Vice President JD Vance, Wiles said he has “been a conspiracy theorist for a decade,” and that his conversion from Trump critic to loyalist was political, driven by his Senate ambitions rather than principle. - She described Elon Musk as “an avowed ketamine user,” “an odd, odd duck,” whose actions were often not “rational” and left her “aghast.” - She called budget director Russell T. Vought a “right-wing absolute zealot.” - Wiles defended USAID, saying that “anyone who has paid attention to government knows they do very good work.” - She said Attorney General Pam Bondi “completely whiffed” the handling of the Epstein files, explaining: “First she gave binders full of nothingness. Then she claimed the witness list or client list was on her desk. There is no client list — and it sure as hell wasn’t on her desk.” - She said the administration needed to “look harder” at deportations to avoid mistakes. - Referring to two mothers who were arrested and deported with their children after voluntarily attending routine immigration meetings, Wiles said: “I can’t understand how you make that mistake — but somebody did.” - She tried unsuccessfully to get Trump to delay major tariffs, citing a “huge disagreement” among his advisers. - Wiles summed up Trump’s governing mindset this way: He operates with a belief that there is nothing he can’t do. Nothing. Zero. Nothing.

TRUMP IS NUTS

 

NEW INC. MAGAZINE COLUMN FROM HOWARD TULLMAN

 

Beware These Retention and Recruitment Mistakes That Will Hurt Employee Engagement

Investing in your people is the highest and best use of any entrepreneur’s time and energy.

EXPERT OPINION BY HOWARD TULLMAN, GENERAL MANAGING PARTNER, G2T3V AND CHICAGO HIGH TECH INVESTORS @HOWARDTULLMAN1

Dec 16, 2025

 

The vast majority of the heated headcount conversations taking place in businesses across the country are primarily focused on workforce reductions, with companies thinking purely short term and trying to “save their way to success.” Sadly, this is both a pipedream and a fool’s errand. It’s still the rule that you’ve got to spend money to make money. Simply cutting back broadly and indiscriminately on your people across the board in a frantic panic designed to please your directors and bankers isn’t the way to build your business for the future.

You’ve spent time and plenty of dollars finding and training these folks, and their experience and specific product and service know-how isn’t going to be that easy to replace when things get better. The general stupidity of the DOGE people in their wholesale dismissals and especially the work of the wrestling moron running the Department of Education (who is now begging dozens of key employees who were abruptly dumped to return to their jobs) is a great example of exactly what not to do.

The next most frequent discussions relate to the need for rapid recruitment of new employees with an over-emphasis on AI-first prospects. Of course, virtually every profile on LinkedIn has already been modified to describe AI chops and vast abilities in that area. And while it’s undoubtedly true in theory that it’s easier today to teach an AI jock about marketing than it is to teach an experienced marketer all about AI, mastery of the new tools and techniques is only an important part of the new job requirements and not the be-all and end-all of the story. It’s a lot more efficient and actually less costly to pair some of your key experienced people with some really smart young people with the right attitudes who can use the new methods to amplify and extend the business’s experience base and increase productivity without the pains and delays of trying to learn the ins-and-outs of a whole new industry on the fly. Leave the rocket science to the rookies, but don’t bet the whole business on a bunch of whiz kids. As my mother used to say: “Hire a young carpenter, but an old physician.”

So, companies should feel free to recruit away, but not at the risk of angering, frustrating or demotivating their current team members. They need a story and a vision that works just as well inside as outside the company. But this juggling act is a lot easier said than done, which is why far too many companies end up overlooking and failing to incorporate it into their overall HR strategies. This puts a substantial premium on retaining their key employees, regardless of tenure, instead of basically taking them for granted and ignoring their own needs and desires.

It’s too late to fix an unhappy situation or retain a key member of the team once they’re already out the door. The best time to keep an employee is before he or she leaves. And the scariest and most unfortunate part of the problem is that the best people aren’t interested in conflicts or complaints. They just make up their minds one day and leave. This is why you can never afford to leave well enough alone. It pays long-term benefits to pay attention all the time.

The risks in our businesses that leave us most vulnerable are the ones we fail to foresee. But today there are cost-effective and relatively easy ways to build yourself and your HR team your very own “crystal ball” to give you a realistic and practical view of the future. I have to admit that when I first looked into this area, I was very skeptical that the data (captured anonymously) and the underlying algorithms could be sufficiently predictive and instructive to be of real value. However, we have watched for more than a decade the growth and success of Balloon, which has built a powerful employee survey and suggestion system based on anonymous inputs which clearly adds immediate value to its users.

One leading company in this new space is Holistic, which provides a comprehensive program called SafeAhead. As you might expect, this system will help you move your team from a painful past of simply reacting to the bad news of unexpected employee departures to a process of proactive actions based on predictive data (customized to your company) which will let you anticipate, intercept and proactively interrupt employee departure plans effectively before the targeted employees even begin planning to leave.
 
Holistic provides a company-wide analysis and set of reports that specifically identify the levels of departure risk associated with each and every team member based on where they are located in the company (departmentally and geographically), their tenure, their levels of management responsibility, their compensation, and various external considerations which are also relevant to their overall attitudes such as changes in their management, missed advancement opportunities, and relocation challenges. As an example, we know that people may hire on because of a company’s reputation or vision, but they regularly leave because of management—especially very early in their employment.

Holistic’s broader reports roll up to provide small actionable target groups of high-risk employees along with specifics regarding each person’s issues and concerns as well as suggestions for management as to how these problems can be addressed and remedied in real time in order to prevent costly and disruptive departures. Visual aids and matrices let senior management see at a glance where in the business the greatest problem areas are located and just how many employees in each given department or division are at various degrees of departure risk.

Responding and reacting to these reports which are predicated on numerous variables like degrees of employee engagement, changes in performance levels, and other supervisory and management issues lets senior management get ahead of the game and stay ahead of inchoate problems by taking affirmative and specifically responsive actions in each case.

I call this approach “preemptive empathy” and every business can use far more of it. Caring for and investing in your people is the highest and best use of any entrepreneur’s time and energy. The real trick is to train your employees well enough so that they could leave; but treat them well enough so they don’t want to.

 

COULD THERE BE ANY DUMBER CLOWNS IN CHARGE THAN THESE FOOLS?

 

COULD THERE BE A SICKER, MORE DISGUSTING AND DERANGED CRIMINAL THAN THIS PIG?

Trump attack on Rob Reiner tests the limits, even for his MAGA base

The president accused Reiner, who was stabbed to death along with his wife, of having “Trump derangement syndrome”

Updated

December 15, 2025 at 6:30 p.m. EST34 minutes ago

 

In the decade since he announced his presidential campaign by branding immigrants as criminals and rapists, the accepted wisdom about Donald Trump has become this: No matter how outrageous are the things he says, he feels no consequences.

With each offensive blast, Republican elected officials are rendered mute, or tell inquiring journalists they haven’t seen the latest and quickly excuse themselves. MAGA influencers applaud and celebrate the ire Trump generates from the left as “owning the liberals.”

 

So what happened Monday was noteworthy — maybe a sign that there really is a limit to how low Trump can take the public discourse, maybe evidence that his powers are waning or maybe nothing more than an anomalous disturbance in the force.

There was actual blowback from some on the right over the president’s reaction to the stabbing deaths of Hollywood director Rob Reiner and his wife, Michele Singer Reiner, allegedly at the hands of their 32-year-old son who had struggled for years with addiction and mental illness. As Trump is wont to do, he made it all about himself.

 

The president described the tragedy this way on the Truth Social media platform that has become an outlet for his id: “Rob Reiner, a tortured and struggling, but once very talented movie director and comedy star, has passed away, together with his wife, Michele, reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind crippling disease known as TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME, sometimes referred to as TDS.”

 

Reiner, Trump wrote, “was known to have driven people CRAZY by his raging obsession of President Donald J. Trump, with his obvious paranoia reaching new heights as the Trump Administration surpassed all goals and expectations of greatness, and with the Golden Age of America upon us, perhaps like never before. May Rob and Michele rest in peace!”

 

This was too much for a handful of conservative influencers who have large followings of their own.

 

“What happened last night to Rob Reiner and his wife was a savage butchering of 2 human lives. I don’t care what their politics were or how they felt about Trump, no law abiding human deserves this. We should pray for + send condolences to his loved ones and NOT make it political,” filmmaker Robby Starbuck wrote on X.

 

British broadcaster Piers Morgan, a longtime friend of Trump, wrote: “This is a dreadful thing to say about a man who just got murdered by his troubled son. Delete it, Mr President.”

 

And even a few Republicans in Congress — albeit those such as Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (Georgia) and Thomas Massie (Kentucky) who have already had their differences with Trump — spoke out. Massie wrote: “Regardless of how you felt about Rob Reiner, this is inappropriate and disrespectful discourse about a man who was just brutally murdered. I guess my elected GOP colleagues, the VP, and White House staff will just ignore it because they’re afraid? I challenge anyone to defend it.”

 

Reiner, who directed what are regarded as a host of modern Hollywood’s finest films, was a major force in Democratic politics and a frequent critic of the president. His shocking and violent death drew immediate comparisons with the assassination in September of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk.

 

Andrew Kolvet, spokesman for Kirk’s organization Turning Point USA, posted a video on X in which Reiner described his reaction to Kirk’s death as “horror — absolute horror.” Kolvet wrote: “Rob Reiner responded with grace and compassion to Charlie’s assassination. This video makes it all the more painful to hear of he and his wife’s tragic end. May God be close to the broken hearted in this terrible story.”

 

But that “grace and compassion” was not universal in the country’s overheated political environment. After Kirk’s death, some of his critics faced blistering criticism for making harsh comments about him.

 

As news of Reiner’s death spread, “liberals are desperately searching for a prominent conservative mocking Rob Reiner and his wife passing,” a MAGA commentator who posts as Gunther Eagleman wrote on X, a platform where he has 1.6 million followers. Trump’s blast came nine hours later.

 

“A man and his wife were murdered last night. This is NOT the appropriate response,” wrote Jenna Ellis, a former attorney pardoned by Trump for her involvement in efforts to overturn the 2020 election. “The Right uniformly condemned political and celebratory responses to Charlie Kirk’s death. This is a horrible example from Trump (and surprising considering the two attempts on his own life) and should be condemned by everyone with any decency.”

 

Others on the right, however, quickly fell in line behind Trump. After predicting “You won’t see people on the right celebrating the horrific murder of Rob Reiner and his wife,” Jack Posobiec (3.2 million followers) wrote on X: “Where is the celebration in Trump’s post? He isn’t celebrating, he is warning.”

And GOP congressional leaders, were true to form. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-South Dakota) declined to comment on Trump’s outburst, saying only: “It’s a tragedy, and my sympathies and prayers go out the Reiner family and to their friends.”

 

In the holiday season, “we have to appeal to our better angels, and I think we’ve got to amplify those voices and those sentiments,” House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) told reporters on Monday. Then he hastened down a private hallway to his office.

 

LIAR IN CHIEF