The
SAVE Act started as a political stunt. Now it’s a real threat.
By Marc Elias
March 16, 2026
In
April 2024, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene threatened to force a vote to remove
Rep. Mike Johnson from the speakership. Johnson’s hold on the gavel was in
genuine danger. As he considered his options, he saw only one way out: a press
conference at Mar-a-Lago with Donald Trump to announce a new legislative effort
built on lies about elections and designed to attack voting rights.
The
gambit worked. At the hastily organized press conference, Johnson repeated
false claims about noncitizen voting, and Trump expressed support for the
embattled speaker. Greene stood down. The crisis had been averted.
Join
350,000 readers who rely on our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest in
voting, elections and democracy.
Over
the following weeks, the details of the promised legislation were worked out,
and the SAVE Act was born.
No
one, except for Donald Trump, took the new bill seriously. Democrats controlled
the Senate, and Joe Biden was in the White House. The bill was crafted to lend
support to Trump’s obsession over his 2020 election defeat and to satisfy the
election deniers in the GOP caucus.
The
core of the bill was the requirement that every voter must prove their
citizenship when they register and that registration must take place in person.
This meant that online and mail-in voter registration would be prohibited.
The
most controversial provision required that the name on a person’s ID match the
documents used to prove citizenship — meaning that married women, and anyone
else who had changed their name, would face serious obstacles using birth
certificates to establish their citizenship. It was estimated that tens of
millions of women would face potential disenfranchisement.
Other
provisions imposed civil and criminal liability on election workers who
register voters without the proper documentation and required states to purge
noncitizens from their voter rolls.
In
July 2024, the bill quietly passed the House on a near party-line vote. By
then, Johnson’s political standing had improved within his party. Yet, everyone
assumed the SAVE Act was dead.
Everyone,
that is, except Donald Trump.
In
September, Congress was facing a potential government shutdown if it did not
pass a new spending bill. Members of both parties wanted to pass a continuing
resolution to postpone the fight until after the 2024 election.
But
Trump had given Johnson his public backing on the implicit understanding that
Johnson would deliver a new voter suppression law — and he aimed to collect.
“If Republicans don’t get the SAVE Act, and every ounce of it,” Trump posted on
social media, “they should not agree to a Continuing Resolution in any way,
shape, or form.”
Trump’s
efforts failed. Congress passed a continuing resolution, and the government was
kept open. But that was not the end of the SAVE Act.
As we entered 2026, it became clear that Republicans were
set up to lose control of Congress in the midterm elections. What followed was
predictable.
With
Republicans in control of Congress and Trump in the White House, the voter
suppression law was reintroduced in 2025. Its provisions were identical to
those of the earlier bill, and its fate was the same. It passed the House, but
Senate Democrats strongly opposed it, and it had no path to overcoming a
filibuster and becoming law.
Once
again, everyone assumed the SAVE Act was dead. Republicans went on to enact
deeply unpopular legislation and Trump’s poll numbers plummeted.
As we
entered 2026, it became clear that Republicans were set up to lose control of
Congress in the midterm elections. What followed was predictable.
Rather
than moderate his positions or respond to public concern, Trump escalated —
moving from lies about election fraud to something far more alarming. He has
mused about canceling elections altogether and made clear he believes
Republicans should take direct control of the voting and counting process.
In
remarks that drew widespread alarm, he declared that states are merely his
“agents” in conducting federal elections — a claim that turns the Constitution
on its head. His Department of Justice has been transformed into an instrument
of political retribution, voter suppression, and election subversion.
Alongside
these actions came a new version of the SAVE Act — the SAVE America Act. While
the original bill focused on adding a proof-of-citizenship requirement, this
new version went much further.
Strict
voter ID was added, including for those voting by mail. The updated bill would
also require states to share sensitive voter data with the Department of
Homeland Security. It would take effect immediately, giving election officials
no opportunity to implement its many changes.
The
House passed this version on Feb. 11, 2026, and it now sits before the Senate.
But fearing a landslide defeat in November, Trump is demanding the GOP go
further still.
In
recent days, he has added additional requirements to what he calls the “watered
down” version passed by the House — including a ban on mail-in voting except
for military personnel and those who are ill or traveling, as well as
restrictions targeting the transgender community. These additions have nothing
to do with voting eligibility; they are simply the price Trump is extracting
from Senate Republicans.
He was promised the SAVE Act in 2024 and expected
Republicans to sacrifice their own political futures to enact it.
Trump
has spent the last few weeks ratcheting up pressure on Senate Majority Leader
John Thune to shepherd the bill through the Senate. The problem is that Thune
does not have the votes to accomplish this.
Several
Republican senators have already said they will not support the measure. Others
will vote for the bill, but they will not vote to lower the threshold for
overcoming a Democratic filibuster. It has even been suggested that House
Republicans may not have the votes to pass the newer version if it were to
reach them.
None
of this will satisfy Trump. He was promised the SAVE Act in 2024 and expected
Republicans to sacrifice their own political futures to enact it. He remains
insistent today that they do the same with an even more suppressive bill.
In the
end, Senate Republicans will not pass this bill. The SAVE Act will again go
dormant.
But if
history is any guide, it will not be for long. Each time it returns, it is
broader, more punitive and more dangerous.
The
question is no longer whether Trump will push a version of this legislation
that strips millions of Americans of their right to vote. We know he will. The
question is whether enough Americans understand what is at stake — and whether
the institutions designed to protect their rights will hold. We all must make
sure they do.