Friday, October 31, 2025

HEATHER

 



October 30, 2025

House speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) continues to try to pin the upcoming catastrophic lapse in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) funding on the Democrats. But with the U.S. Department of Agriculture sitting on $6 billion in funds Congress appropriated for just such an event, the Treasury finding $20 billion to prop up Trump ally Javier Milei in Argentina, Johnson refusing to bring the House into regular session to negotiate an end to the government shutdown, and President Donald J. Trump demanding $230 million in damages from the American taxpayer, bulldozing the East Wing of the White House to build a gold-plated ballroom that will dwarf the existing White House, and traveling to Asia, where South Korean leadership courted him by giving him a gold crown and serving him brownies topped with edible gold, blaming any funding shortfall on Democrats is a hard sell.

According to a Washington Post–ABC survey, more Americans blame Trump and congressional Republicans for the shutdown than blame Democrats by a margin of 45 to 33, and Trump’s approval rating continues to move downward, with the presidential approval average reported by Fifty Plus One at 41.3% approval and 55.1% disapproval, a –14 split. G. Elliott Morris of Strength in Numbers noted on October 24 that polls show Americans now trust Democrats more than Republicans to handle the economy well.

Trump ran in 2024 with a promise to bring down inflation, which was then close to the Federal Reserve’s target of 2.0%; now core inflation is at 3%, having gone up every month since April. Halloween candy—on people’s minds today—is at 9.8% inflation and costs 44% more than it did in 2019. Federal Reserve Board chair Jerome Powell sure sounded like he was describing stagflation—a condition when the economy stagnates despite inflation—when he said yesterday: “In the near term, risks to inflation are tilted to the upside, and risks to employment to the downside, a challenging situation.”

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said today that while the stock market has done well this year, a better economy is going to “start flowing through to working Americans next year.”

Meanwhile, on Tuesday, in a rambling and disjointed speech in Japan, Trump told U.S. military personnel that he is federalizing National Guard troops and sending them into Democratic-led cities “because we’re going to have safe cities.” In the same speech, Trump repeatedly attacked former president Joe Biden and insisted yet again that the 2020 presidential election was rigged. (It was not.)

When asked by a reporter later to clarify his remarks, Trump referred back to the Insurrection Act, saying that if he invoked it, “I’d be allowed to do whatever I want. But we haven’t chosen to do that because we’re…doing very well without it. But I’d be allowed to do that, you understand that. And the courts wouldn’t get involved. Nobody would get involved. And I could send the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines. I can send anybody I wanted.”

In fact, a president can invoke the accurately named Insurrection Act only in times of insurrection or rebellion. Neither of those conditions exists.

But the administration is working hard to create the impression that they do. Drew Harwell and Joyce Sohyun Lee of the Washington Post reported yesterday that the videos the Department of Homeland Security has been publishing to demonstrate the administration’s triumph over crime in U.S. cities as its agents work “day and night to arrest, detain and deport vicious criminals” have been doctored. They do not represent current actions, but rather are a hash of video from different states and different times.

When the reporters asked the White House about the misleading footage, spokesperson Abigail Jackson told them that “the Trump administration will continue to highlight the many successes of the president’s agenda through engaging content and banger memes on social media.”

There are signs the administration is not just trying to give the impression that Americans are rioting, but is trying to push them to do so.

Aaron Glantz of The Guardian reported yesterday that on October 8, Major General Ronald Burkett, who directs the Pentagon’s National Guard bureau, ordered the National Guard in all the states, U.S. territories, and the District of Columbia to form “quick reaction forces” trained in “riot control.” Most states are required to train 500 National Guard personnel, for a total nationwide of 23,500. The forces are supposed to be in place by January 1, 2026.

In his order, Burkett relied on an executive order Trump signed on August 25, calling on the secretary of defense to “immediately begin ensuring that each State’s Army National Guard and Air National Guard are resourced, trained, organized, and available to assist Federal, State, and local law enforcement in quelling civil disturbances and ensuring the public safety and order,” and “ensure the availability of a standing National Guard quick reaction force that shall be resourced, trained, and available for rapid nationwide deployment.”

In August the administration planned for two groups of 300 troops to be stationed in Alabama and Arizona as a “Domestic Civil Disturbance Quick Reaction Force.” Now that number is 23,500, and the troops will be in every state and territory.

The establishment of a domestic quick reaction force to quell civil disturbances at a time when there are no civil disturbances that can’t be handled easily by existing law enforcement suggests the administration is expecting those conditions to change.

That expectation might have something to do with Monday’s story from Anna Giaritelli of the Washington Examiner that the White House is reassigning ICE field officers and replacing them with officers from Customs and Border Patrol (CBP). Greg Wehner and Bill Melugin of Fox News reported that the shift will affect at least eight cities, including Los Angeles, San Diego, Phoenix, Denver, Portland, Philadelphia, El Paso, and New Orleans.

White House officials, presumably led by White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, who has said the administration intends to carry out “a minimum” of 3,000 arrests a day, are frustrated by the current pace of about 900 a day. So those officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, special government employee and Noem advisor Corey Lewandowski, and Greg Bovino, a Border Patrol sector chief who has been overseeing the agency’s operations in Los Angeles and Chicago, have decided to ramp up those deportations by replacing ICE officials with far more aggressive CBP leaders.

Tripling arrests will likely bring pushback.

Michael Scherer, Missy Ryan, and Ashley Parker of The Atlantic reported today that political appointees Stephen Miller, Kristi Noem, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have moved onto military bases.

The designs of the anti-immigrant leaders in the administration dovetail with Trump’s political designs. Trump has talked a lot about serving a third term in the presidency, most recently talking about it to reporters on Air Force One earlier this week. The Twenty-Second Amendment to the Constitution prohibits a third term, but Trump ally Stephen Bannon told The Economist last week that “Trump is going to be president in ‘28 and people just ought to get accommodated with that.” Bannon claimed, “There’s many different alternatives” to get around the Twenty-Second Amendment. Trump keeps “Trump 2028” campaign hats on bookshelves outside the Oval Office.

Janessa Goldbeck, the chief executive officer of the nonprofit Vet Voice Foundation, told Guardian reporter Glantz that Burkett’s recent order shows “an attempt by the president to normalize a national, militarized police force.” Such a force has not just military but also electoral power: it could be used in Democratic-led states to suppress voting. In a worst-case scenario, Goldbeck said, “the president could declare a state of emergency and say that elections are rigged and use allegations of voter fraud to seize the ballots of secure voting centers.”

Today, Buckingham Palace announced that King Charles has “initiated a formal process to remove the style, titles and honours of Prince Andrew” over his relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and participation in activities surrounding Epstein. Andrew will be stripped even of his title of “prince” and will be forced to leave the home he has shared for more than 20 years with his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, at Royal Lodge, a 30-room mansion located in Windsor Great Park. The palace said: “These censures are deemed necessary, notwithstanding the fact that he continues to deny the allegations against him.”

Today Jim Acosta reported that survivors of Epstein’s sex trafficking enterprise have written a letter to Speaker Johnson demanding that Representative-elect Adelita Grijalva (D-AZ) be sworn into office. Voters elected Grijalva on September 23, but Johnson has steadfastly refused to swear her in. Grijalva has said she will provide the last signature necessary on a discharge petition to force a vote on the public release of the Epstein files, an outcome that threatens to expose how and why Trump was named in those files.

The survivors write that Johnson’s “continued refusal to seat her is an unacceptable breach of democratic norms and a disservice to the American people. Even more concerning to us as survivors, this delay appears to be a deliberate attempt to block her participation in the discharge petition that would force a vote to unseal the Epstein/Maxwell files. The American public has a right to transparency and accountability, and we, as survivors, deserve justice. Any attempt to obstruct a vote on this matter—by manipulating House procedure or denying elected members their seats—is a direct affront to that right and adds insult to our trauma.”

Notes:

https://thehill.com/homenews/5582193-trump-gop-blamed-shutdown/?tbref=hp

https://fiftyplusone.news/polls/approval/president

Strength In Numbers
Polls show voters now trust Democrats more to handle the economy
Donald Trump won the 2024 election because of inflation. The issue was the most important to voters’ choices in 2024, according to a Gallup poll. And rising prices were generally a public relations nightmare for Joe Biden’s presidency — especially for Americans most sensitive to cost increases. Exit polling data from the Associated Press and NORC…
Read more

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/30/trump-east-wing-ballroom-poll-00629724

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/28/us/politics/trump-japan-national-guard-us-cities.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2025/10/29/trump-administration-misleading-videos/

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/28/2025-16614/additional-measures-to-address-the-crime-emergency-in-the-district-of-columbia

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/oct/29/pentagon-memo-quick-reaction-forces

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/south-korea-award-trump-its-highest-medal-gift-him-golden-crown-2025-10-29/

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-administration-reassign-ice-intensify-deportation-campaign-border-patrol/

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/3864929/trump-administration-quietly-purges-ice-leaders-in-five-cities-sources/

https://www.foxnews.com/us/ice-leadership-shakeup-exposes-growing-dhs-friction-over-deportation-tactics-priorities

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/10/trump-officials-military-housing-stephen-miller/684748/

https://www.npr.org/2025/10/30/nx-s1-5590293/trump-2028-third-term-constitution

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/10/30/pentagon-national-guard-quick-reaction-force/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/08/12/national-guard-civil-unrest/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/10/30/andrew-title-prince-charles-epstein/

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cnveqgj957dt

The Jim Acosta Show
BREAKING NEWS EXCLUSIVE: Epstein Survivors Send Letter to House Speaker Mike Johnson Demanding that Adelita Grijalva is Sworn In.
Thank you to everyone who tuned into my live video! Join me for my next live video in the app…
Listen now
Montana Independent News
Epstein/Maxwell Survivors Send Letter To Speaker Mike Johnson Demanding Adelita Grijalva Be Sworn In
By Denise Rivette…
Read more

Bluesky:

Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com
Q: What did you mean when you said you're prepared to send 'more than the National Guard' into American cities? TRUMP: if I want to enact a certain act, I'd be allowed to do whatever I want. The courts wouldn't get involved. Nobody would. I could send Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines -anybody I want
Wed, 29 Oct 2025 13:31:32 GMT
View on Bluesky

owenwntr.bsky.social/post/3m4b3x3r7lk2f

atrupar.com/post/3m4g5hzdkqg2q

darinself.com/post/3m4e3xdxlxs24

steverattner.bsky.social/post/3m4gjbebcqk2g

steverattner.bsky.social/post/3m3wv5r2zsk2g

ronfilipkowski.bsky.social/post/3m4gcrtgkwc2i

JOYCE VANCE - IS JUSTICE DONE?



Is Justice Done?

Joyce Vance

Oct 30, 2025

 

You’ve probably seen or read at least something about the story that is the subject of tonight’s post. If you appreciate having access to an explanation of the federal sentencing process and the kind of context for situations like this that I provide based on 25 years of experience at DOJ as a line prosecutor, an appellate chief, and a political appointee, the U.S. Attorney in North Alabama during the Obama administration, I hope you’ll support my work with a subscription to Civil Discourse.

On July 14, 2023, Taylor Taranto, 37, of Pasco, Washington, was charged in a federal indictment with carrying a firearm without a license and possessing an illegal device designed to feed large quantities of ammunition to a firearm. He was also charged with four misdemeanors related to his involvement with events on January 6. The government’s evidence against Taranto included a video that captures him saying, “So we’re in the Capitol Building … legislative building … we just stormed it.” The caption reads: “This is me ‘stormin’ the capitol’ lol I’m only sharing this so someone will report me to the feds and we can get this party rolling!”

The charges related to January 6 were wiped out by Donald Trump. But Taranto was convicted on the gun charges in May of this year. Those charges stemmed from an arrest near former President Barack Obama’s home in the District of Columbia. The charges don’t mention President Obama. The Justice Department’s official release indicated that “Prior to his arrest, court documents say that Taranto made several concerning statements regarding the residences in the area and desires to commit acts of violence against a federal facility.”

Taranto’s van was searched pursuant to his arrest. He had quite an arsenal with him, including the two weapons circled in yellow below. All told, investigators said they found two guns, a machete and hundreds of rounds of ammunition in Taranto’s van.

A table with guns and ammo

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Photo from the government’s sentencing memo

 

How did Taranto know where Obama lived? Donald Trump posted it on social media in June of 2023. Taranto was arrested in Obama’s neighborhood the same day. The government moved to detain Taranto, explaining in their memo to the Judge that he was live streaming on YouTube, saying he was looking for an “entrance points” to underground tunnels and was trying to line up a “good angle on a shot.” He reposted Trump’s message about Obama’s home address and wrote: “We got these losers surrounded! See you in hell, Podesta’s and Obama’s,” a reference to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign manager.

The case has been in the news this week because Taranto was due back in court to be sentenced. The prosecutors filed a sentencing memo for the Judge that accurately reflected the defendant’s conduct. This is what prosecutors do in every case.

Federal law requires judges to impose a sentence that is “sufficient, but not greater than necessary” to reflect the seriousness of the offense, promote respect for the law, and provide just punishment, while also deterring future crimes, protecting the public from the defendant, and affording the defendant rehabilitation opportunities. Judges are required by law to consider a number of factors, including the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant. So prosecutors write to those issues in their sentencing memo, analyzing the evidence to advocate for the sentence they believe the judge should impose. It’s literally their job. You don’t leave key details, like a defendant threatening to send a former president to hell, out of the equation.

But in this case, simply doing their jobs resulted in the removal of the prosecutors. ABC’s Katherine Fauders was the first to report that “Two federal prosecutors were informed Wednesday they will be put on leave after filing a legal brief that described the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol as being carried out by ‘thousands of people comprising a mob of rioters,’ sources tell me.” She continued, “The two prosecutors, Carlos Valdivia and Samuel White, were locked out of their government devices and informed Wednesday morning they will be placed on leave just hours after filing a sentencing memorandum in the case of Taylor Taranto.” Already furloughed because of the government shutdown, the prosecutors were told they’d be placed on administrative leave when government reopened. Putting the prosecutors on leave could be a prelude to firing them, unless the public spotlight forces DOJ to walk the personnel action back.

Subsequently, the Washington Post reported that “By Wednesday afternoon, the filing had been removed from public court dockets and replaced by a new sentencing memo. All references to Jan. 6, Trump’s social media post, Valdivia or White [the two prosecutors] had been removed. Two new prosecutors signed the replacement filing.”

It’s hard to overstate how serious this is. We’ve now seen revenge prosecutions, like those against former FBI Director Jim Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James. We have seen prosecution withheld for cronies of the president, like the pass border czar Tom Homan got for allegedly taking $50,000 in exchange for a promise to steer government contracts to the people who paid him. We saw agents and prosecutors fired for doing their duty and working on investigations assigned to them, like the January 6 cases and the Trump investigations, at the start of this administration. And now we are seeing prosecutors being disciplined for telling the courts the truth—in an era where this administration has increasingly withheld it from the courts.

The assassination attempts against Donald Trump were taken seriously and swiftly investigated and prosecuted by the Biden administration. Any attack on a former federal official is a serious matter. Apparently, in this Justice Department, that is no longer the case. Whether it was the mention of President Obama or of Donald Trump’s role in making his address public that triggered this situation, it’s utterly appalling. It completes the corruption of the Justice Department.

MSNBC’s Ken Dilanian reported that the action against the prosecutors came “at the direction of the White House.” Pam Bondi and other political appointees should have prevented this from happening. Instead—although we don’t know exactly what happened internally—they facilitated or initiated it. They certainly didn’t interfere with it. CBS Justice Correspondent Scott MacFarlane reported that when District of Columbia U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro was asked about removing any reference to January 6 from the sentencing memo and asked why it had happened, she declined to answer beyond saying the “papers speak for themselves.” She also refused to discuss the action taken against the case prosecutors.

If the direction to do this came from the White House, officials like Bondi and Pirro should have resigned rather than letting it happen. They should have protected the prosecutors and the integrity of the case. They should have stood for the rule of law. Not doing so reveals who they are in an undeniable fashion. This isn’t hard. It’s easy. And they got it wrong.

Near the end of the first Trump administration, acting DOJ officials who were in place as Republican appointees refused Trump’s direction to support his lies about election fraud. They walked away with their heads held high and their reputations intact. This group has not learned that lesson.

The prosecution’s sentencing memo asked the Judge to impose a 27-month sentence to reflect the gravity of Taranto’s conduct, his lack of remorse, and the need to deter him and others from engaging in similar threatening conduct. It’s a reasonable request, one that is within the sentencing guidelines for the offense.

A screenshot of a text

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

 

But Donald Trump is intent on whitewashing history to improve his own position in it. I write about it in my book as a “new lost cause,” a parallel to the post-Civil War narrative that romanticized “the old South” and slavery, giving rise to narratives that shaped themselves into today’s Christian Nationalism. Trump has rebranded January 6 criminals as patriots and attempted to restore them to the American mainstream. It’s a story about a new “lost cause,” transforming disloyal criminals into an idealized version of the story. Trump’s Justice Department is aiding and abetting in that Orwellian task. “And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed—if all records told the same tale—then the lie passed into history and became truth,” Orwell wrote in 1984. “The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became the truth.” His main character, Winston, muses about whether, “Within twenty years at the most … the huge and simple question, ‘Was life better before the Revolution than it is now?’ would have ceased once and for all to be answerable.”

Trump is so intent on rewriting his own history that he wants prosecutors to erase it even in a criminal case where facts are being presented to a Judge. That Judge was not impressed. In today’s sentencing hearing, he questioned DOJ about the substitute second sentencing memo, which removed references to January 6 and Trump’s post of Obama’s address. Taranto was sentenced to 21 months, and since he has already served more than that while awaiting trial, he’ll be released, but will remain under supervision by U.S. Probation for three years. The President who set him on his path has faced no consequences. Fixing that will be up to us, to the voters, who have work ahead of us when we vote to see to it that this president is finally held accountable and that a new Congress that will return to performing its constitutional duties is seated after the midterms. It’s a sorry state of affairs at the Justice Department. Our work is cut out for us.

We’re in this together,

Joyce 

Thursday, October 30, 2025