Fox News’s election
fraud pandering may be its most dangerous lie yet
Rupert Murdoch doesn’t
believe Trump was cheated. But he’s letting Fox personalities spin tales that
could permanently harm America.
By Peter
Kafka Nov 13, 2020, 9:40am EST
President Trump is acting badly. He is being supported by
enablers in his government and by allies who fear him and/or want to take
advantage of him. And he’s being supported by Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News.
So what else is new?
The stakes. There’s a very small chance that Trump could
actually disrupt a peaceful transfer of power with his baseless claims of
election fraud. He will, more likely, permanently damage America’s ability to
hold elections by undermining much of the country’s faith in them.
It’s time for Fox to dispense with the bad-faith, bifurcated
approach to the truth it has used for years, which allows its most popular
stars to peddle lies to its audience under the guise that they’re merely
offering their opinions.
That won’t happen, of course.
That’s in part because of Fox’s well-documented symbiosis with Trump, where its top talent
— Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson, Laura Ingraham, the Fox
& Friends crew — act as Trump’s on- and off-air advisers and
cheering squad. (Even this week, as Trump floats a trial balloon that he’ll ditch Fox and
take his audience to a much smaller media operation, like Newsmax, or start his own “rival” network, his complaints on Twitter are about Fox’s news operation,
not his TV pals.)
And it’s in part because Murdoch, who enjoys conservative
politics but truly loves power, has an endgame in mind: By mid-January, Joe
Biden will be president, and Fox News will be the disloyal opposition, a
position where it thrives.
What we’re seeing now is a warmup act. In one part of the Fox
universe, Trump and his team are making as-yet-unfounded allegations of
election fraud — or Trump and his team are fighting election fraud but everyone
else is against them and it may not work out.
Either way, we’ll get to the same point next year, where Fox
News is very comfortable attacking the Democratic president — who some viewers
will believe doesn’t have the right to be in office.
As NPR media correspondent David Folkenflik reminded me in our chat this week on Recode
Media, that’s a trope Fox News has used since its founding in
1996. It pushed the message that Barack Obama was (supposedly) an illegitimate
president because he (supposedly) wasn’t born in the United States (not
coincidentally, the main proponent behind this theory was ... Donald Trump).
But in Foxland, Bill Clinton was also an illegitimate president
— because he won his election with the help of Ross Perot, who ran as a
third-party candidate and drew away votes that should have gone to George H.W.
Bush.
So maybe Trump really will stop showing up on Fox and praising
its talent on Twitter. Maybe he really will head to a would-be-rival TV network
with minuscule ratings, or try to launch his own online service. Most likely, I
think, he’ll end up as a recurring guest on Fox News, where he can keep doing
what he does best — rant daily, without having to do anything else — and
Murdoch can keep Trump’s fans on his network. Either way, when Trump leaves the
White House, Fox News will spend the next four years laying into his successor.
But in the meantime, Murdoch is once again trying to have it
both ways: His news operation — the one Trump tweets angrily about — has told
its viewers that Trump lost the election and that his complaints about voter
fraud are made up. But in the morning, and at night, it’s a different story.
- Last Friday, for
instance, Hannity brought on Republican National Committee Chair Ronna
McDaniel for a segment in which they both suggested that voter fraud was
quite plausible. That was not a coincidence: According to a GOP memo Folkenflik viewed,
the two sides worked out with “great specificity the intended flow of the
show’s lengthy opening segment — including its guests, articles and
subjects — and the primary points Hannity would make.”
- On Tuesday night,
Ingraham hosted someone who said they were a poll worker in Nevada (her
guest’s face and voice were disguised) who claimed to have seen some kind
of Biden-Harris ballot chicanery.
- And on Wednesday night,
Carlson explained that the mainstream media is refusing to look into
plausible vote fraud allegations (Trump’s campaign tweeted this one out;
Trump retweeted it):
Hannity, Carlson, and Ingraham do their own version of the Fox
News two-step: They don’t come out and say outright that Trump is a victim of
massive voter fraud that cost him the election while simultaneously defeating
Democratic House and Senate candidates. But they argue that it’s plausible.
They feed the fire with oxygen.
Fox isn’t the only one playing this game. Much of the Republican
Party, from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on down, engages in a
similar version: either flat-out suggesting that Trump’s claims are legitimate
or at least arguing that he should be able to make those claims and then see
what happens.
It’s easy for anyone who wants to look to see what’s really
happening. There’s the objective truth — hammered away at by the likes of the
New York Times, which ran “Election Officials Nationwide Find No Fraud” as
its banner print headline on Wednesday.
Republicans are eager to tell reporters the same thing but won’t
attach their names to their statements. On background, they announce that
they’re simply humoring Trump, or treating him, toddler-like, as someone who
needs to be gently prodded into accepting his loss. Some
Republicans are telling CNN’s Jake Tapper that this is “all part of walking
President Trump through this process emotionally.” Or they say that Trump is in
on the joke: A “top White House aide” tells NBC’s Peter Alexander that Trump realizes his claims are “theater.”
This is all par for the course for the past four years, and
beyond: If you consume a steady diet of Fox News and nothing but, you see the
world very differently than the rest of America, even when it comes to life-and-death issues like the Covid-19 pandemic.
(It may also matter which Fox host you like more: A study this spring concluded that Fox
viewers who watched more of Hannity, who consistently downplayed the coronavirus
in the spring, were more likely to contract Covid-19 than Fox viewers who
watched more of Carlson, who was the rare Fox opinion host who warned viewers
about the pandemic early on.)
And maybe this is the time we’ll get lucky, and the viewers of
the country’s most popular news channel will eventually come around to the idea
that Joe Biden is a legitimate president. As of this week, at least 80 percent
of the country — and 60 percent of Republicans — say Biden won, per a Reuters/Ipsos poll.
On the other hand: Four years ago, just weeks after the
presidential election, a 28-year-old man with a semiautomatic assault rifle walked
into a pizza place and fired his gun because he was trying to
“shine some light” on claims that Democrats ran a pedophile ring. At the time,
“Pizzagate” was a dark conspiracy that lived mostly online; Tucker Carlson
wasn’t doing segments on Hillary Clinton’s link to sex traffickers. (It hasn’t
gone away, either: Pizzagate has now merged with QAnon, an all-encompassing conspiracy theory that
is just as extreme but has become mainstream enough that it is sending adherents to Congress.)
Now Fox News is dancing with a conspiracy theory that could be
equally upsetting to an angry, suggestible audience. The best-case scenario is
that Fox merely convinces its audience that voting is rigged against them. And
its viewers are content to just watch Fox, seething.
But that’s a terrible range of outcomes. We shouldn’t expect
better from Fox’s leaders. But we should definitely ask them to do better.
